flight 166305 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/166305/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-armhf-libvirt 6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 151777
build-amd64-libvirt
On 23.11.21 09:38, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 22.11.2021 10:28, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>> --- a/xen/include/xen/rangeset.h
>> +++ b/xen/include/xen/rangeset.h
>> @@ -51,6 +51,9 @@ void rangeset_limit(
>>/* Pretty-print range limits in hexadecimal. */
>> #define
On 22.11.2021 10:28, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> --- a/xen/include/xen/rangeset.h
> +++ b/xen/include/xen/rangeset.h
> @@ -51,6 +51,9 @@ void rangeset_limit(
> /* Pretty-print range limits in hexadecimal. */
> #define _RANGESETF_prettyprint_hex 0
> #define RANGESETF_prettyprint_hex (1U
Hi, Julien!
On 22.11.21 21:31, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Oleksandr,
>
> On 18/11/2021 06:59, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>> Hi, Julien!
>>
>> On 16.11.21 21:22, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> Hi Oleksandr,
>>>
>>> On 05/11/2021 06:33, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
Hi, Julien!
On 22.11.21 19:36, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 18/11/2021 10:46, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>> On 18.11.21 09:27, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>>> Hi, Julien!
>>>
>>> On 16.11.21 21:12, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Oleksandr,
On 05/11/2021 06:33, Oleksandr
On 22.11.21 19:17, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 22/11/2021 16:23, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>> On 22.11.21 17:29, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> I would prefer to go with my way. This can be refined in the future if we
>>> find Device-Tree that matches what you wrote.
>> Ok, so just to make
On 22.11.21 23:16, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
From: Stefano Stabellini
If the xenstore page hasn't been allocated properly, reading the value
of the related hvm_param (HVM_PARAM_STORE_PFN) won't actually return
error. Instead, it will succeed and return zero. Instead of attempting
to xen_remap
On Mon, 22 Nov 2021, Julien Grall wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Nov 2021 at 19:59, Stefano Stabellini
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 22 Nov 2021, Ayan Kumar Halder wrote:
> > > Stefano > It doesn't look like we are setting dabt->write anywhere.
> > >
> > > Ayan > Yes, this is a miss. Depending on the opc, this
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 08:18:26AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 15.11.2021 20:09, Julien Grall wrote:
> >
> > However, for Elliott's case, I am not sure this is going to sufficient.
> > The Raspberry PI has some devices that can only DMA into the first 1GB
> > of the RAM (the GPU seems to be
On Mon, 22 Nov 2021, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Nov 2021, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 19.11.2021 21:29, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > --- a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c
> > > @@ -951,6 +951,20 @@ static int __init xenbus_init(void)
> >
From: Stefano Stabellini
If the xenstore page hasn't been allocated properly, reading the value
of the related hvm_param (HVM_PARAM_STORE_PFN) won't actually return
error. Instead, it will succeed and return zero. Instead of attempting
to xen_remap a bad guest physical address, detect this
On 11/19/21 10:39 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
The prototype of mem_map_via_hcall() is missing in its header, so add
it.
Reported-by: kernel test robot
Fixes: a43fb7da53007e67ad ("xen/pvh: Move Xen code for getting mem map via hcall out
of common file")
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross
Applied
On Mon, 22 Nov 2021, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 19.11.2021 21:29, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > --- a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c
> > +++ b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c
> > @@ -951,6 +951,20 @@ static int __init xenbus_init(void)
> > err = hvm_get_parameter(HVM_PARAM_STORE_PFN,
flight 166267 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/166267/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 19 guest-stopfail like 166260
test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-amd
flight 166266 linux-linus real [real]
flight 166299 linux-linus real-retest [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/166266/
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/166299/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
Hi,
On Mon, 22 Nov 2021 at 19:59, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>
> On Mon, 22 Nov 2021, Ayan Kumar Halder wrote:
> > Stefano > It doesn't look like we are setting dabt->write anywhere.
> >
> > Ayan > Yes, this is a miss. Depending on the opc, this should be upadeted
> > accordingly in
On Mon, 22 Nov 2021, Ayan Kumar Halder wrote:
> Stefano > It doesn't look like we are setting dabt->write anywhere.
>
> Ayan > Yes, this is a miss. Depending on the opc, this should be upadeted
> accordingly in decode_64bit_loadstore_postindexing().
>
> Stefano > Also, is info.gpa in
Hi Oleksandr,
On 18/11/2021 06:59, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
Hi, Julien!
On 16.11.21 21:22, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Oleksandr,
On 05/11/2021 06:33, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
Currently Xen maps all IRQs and memory ranges for all devices except
those
On 18/11/2021 07:34, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
Hi, Julien!
Hi,
On 17.11.21 23:45, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Oleksandr,
On 05/11/2021 06:33, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
There is no reason to use void pointer while passing ECAM ops to the
Hi,
On 18/11/2021 10:46, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
On 18.11.21 09:27, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
Hi, Julien!
On 16.11.21 21:12, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Oleksandr,
On 05/11/2021 06:33, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
In order for vPCI to work it needs
Hi,
On 22/11/2021 16:23, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
On 22.11.21 17:29, Julien Grall wrote:
I would prefer to go with my way. This can be refined in the future if we find
Device-Tree that matches what you wrote.
Ok, so just to make it clear:
>a PCI device would always be described as a
On 22.11.2021 17:26, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 22/11/2021 09:08, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 19.11.2021 19:21, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
>>> @@ -759,21 +759,7 @@ static int nmi_show_execution_state(const struct
>>> cpu_user_regs *regs, int
On 22.11.2021 17:16, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 22/11/2021 09:04, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 19.11.2021 19:21, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/entry.S
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/entry.S
>>> @@ -773,14 +773,48 @@ handle_exception_saved:
>>> sti
>>> 1: movq
On 22/11/2021 09:08, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 19.11.2021 19:21, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> do{_reserved,}_trap() should use fatal_trap() rather than opencoding part of
> Nit: That's do{_unhandled,}_trap() now.
Ah yes. Will fix.
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
>> @@
On 22.11.21 17:29, Julien Grall wrote:
>
>
> On 18/11/2021 07:13, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>> Hi, Julien!
>
> Hi Oleksandr,
>
>> On 17.11.21 23:33, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> Hi Oleksandr,
>>>
>>> On 17/11/2021 06:56, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
Hi, Julien!
On 16.11.21
On 22/11/2021 09:04, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 19.11.2021 19:21, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/entry.S
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/entry.S
>> @@ -773,14 +773,48 @@ handle_exception_saved:
>> sti
>> 1: movq %rsp,%rdi
>> movzbl
From: "Longpeng(Mike)"
A CPU will not show up in virtualized environment which includes an
Enclave. The VM splits its resources into a primary VM and a Enclave
VM. While the Enclave is active, the hypervisor will ignore all requests
to bring up a CPU and this CPU will remain in CPU_UP_PREPARE
On 14.09.2021 14:35, Juergen Gross wrote:
> The sysctl and domctl hypercalls are not stable, so tools using those
> need to be in sync with the hypervisor.
>
> In order to decouple (some) tools from the hypervisor add a new stable
> hypercall __HYPERVISOR_control_op
I'm not convinced we need a
On 18/11/2021 07:13, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
Hi, Julien!
Hi Oleksandr,
On 17.11.21 23:33, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Oleksandr,
On 17/11/2021 06:56, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
Hi, Julien!
On 16.11.21 20:48, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Oleksander,
On 05/11/2021 06:33, Oleksandr
Hi Penny,
> On 16 Nov 2021, at 06:31, Penny Zheng wrote:
>
> From: Stefano Stabellini
>
> This commit creates a new doc to document how to do passthrough without IOMMU.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini
> Signed-off-by: Penny Zheng
> ---
> docs/misc/arm/passthrough-noiommu.txt | 52
Hi Ayan
> On 22 Nov 2021, at 14:19, Ayan Kumar Halder
> wrote:
>
> Hi Julien/Stefano/Wei/Jan,
>
> Many thanks for your review.
>
> As some of the comments were inter-related, I have consolidated my response
> to all the comments below.
>
> On 19/11/2021 17:26, Julien Grall wrote:
>> Hi
On 22.11.21 16:57, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 22.11.2021 15:45, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>>
>> On 22.11.21 16:37, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 22.11.2021 15:21, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
On 19.11.21 15:34, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> On 19.11.21 15:25, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 22.11.2021 15:45, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>
>
> On 22.11.21 16:37, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 22.11.2021 15:21, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>>> On 19.11.21 15:34, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
On 19.11.21 15:25, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 19.11.2021 14:16, Oleksandr
On Monday, November 22, 2021 9:39 AM, From: Jan Beulich wrote:
>On 22.11.2021 15:17, Stewart Hildebrand wrote:
>> Josh works at another company now
>
>You don't happen to know his email there, do you? Else if would have been
>good to Cc him so he could confirm.
>
>Jan
I added Josh in CC. Josh -
On 22.11.2021 14:48, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 22/11/2021 08:57, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 19.11.2021 19:21, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/crash.c
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/crash.c
>>> @@ -36,10 +36,8 @@ static unsigned int crashing_cpu;
>>> static DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(bool,
On 22.11.21 16:37, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 22.11.2021 15:21, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>> On 19.11.21 15:34, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>>> On 19.11.21 15:25, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 19.11.2021 14:16, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> On 19.11.21 15:00, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>
On 22.11.2021 15:17, Stewart Hildebrand wrote:
> Josh works at another company now
You don't happen to know his email there, do you? Else if would have been
good to Cc him so he could confirm.
Jan
> Signed-off-by: Stewart Hildebrand
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
On 22/11/2021 14:29, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 22.11.21 15:10, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
On 22/11/2021 12:48, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 22.11.21 12:42, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Juergen,
On 14/09/2021 13:35, Juergen Gross wrote:
Xenstore is referencing domains by their domid, but reuse of
On 22.11.2021 15:21, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> On 19.11.21 15:34, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>> On 19.11.21 15:25, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 19.11.2021 14:16, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
On 19.11.21 15:00, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 19.11.2021 13:34, Oleksandr Andrushchenko
On 22.11.21 15:10, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
On 22/11/2021 12:48, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 22.11.21 12:42, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Juergen,
On 14/09/2021 13:35, Juergen Gross wrote:
Xenstore is referencing domains by their domid, but reuse of a domid
can lead to the situation that Xenstore
On 19.11.21 15:34, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>
> On 19.11.21 15:25, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 19.11.2021 14:16, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>>> On 19.11.21 15:00, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 19.11.2021 13:34, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> Possible locking and other work needed:
Hi Julien/Stefano/Wei/Jan,
Many thanks for your review.
As some of the comments were inter-related, I have consolidated my
response to all the comments below.
On 19/11/2021 17:26, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Ayan,
On 19/11/2021 16:52, Ayan Kumar Halder wrote:
At present, post indexing
Josh works at another company now
Signed-off-by: Stewart Hildebrand
---
MAINTAINERS | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 4956db1011..fc8b2c1169 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -221,7 +221,6 @@ F: xen/include/xen/argo.h
F:
Hi,
On 22/11/2021 12:48, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 22.11.21 12:42, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Juergen,
On 14/09/2021 13:35, Juergen Gross wrote:
Xenstore is referencing domains by their domid, but reuse of a domid
can lead to the situation that Xenstore can't tell whether a domain
with that domid
On 22/11/2021 08:57, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 19.11.2021 19:21, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/crash.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/crash.c
>> @@ -36,10 +36,8 @@ static unsigned int crashing_cpu;
>> static DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(bool, crash_save_done);
>>
>> /* This becomes the NMI
On 22.11.2021 13:46, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 22.11.21 11:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 14.09.2021 14:35, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> Add a bitmap with one bit per possible domid indicating the respective
>>> domain has changed its state (created, deleted, dying, crashed,
>>> shutdown).
>>>
>>>
On 22.11.21 12:42, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Juergen,
On 14/09/2021 13:35, Juergen Gross wrote:
Xenstore is referencing domains by their domid, but reuse of a domid
can lead to the situation that Xenstore can't tell whether a domain
with that domid has been deleted and created again without
On 22.11.21 11:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 14.09.2021 14:35, Juergen Gross wrote:
Add a bitmap with one bit per possible domid indicating the respective
domain has changed its state (created, deleted, dying, crashed,
shutdown).
Registering the VIRQ_DOM_EXC event will result in setting the bits
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 11:52:39AM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> In practice this currently fails on some of our hosts. We don't seem
> to have resources to investigate properly, and this will be blocking
> recomissioning of hosts if we don't get it out of the way.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson
Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson
Release-Acked-by: Ian Jackson
---
README.dev | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/README.dev b/README.dev
index 3d09b3c6b..132772fb4 100644
--- a/README.dev
+++ b/README.dev
@@ -108,6 +108,8 @@ Create the tftp directory (must be done after firmware is
In practice this currently fails on some of our hosts. We don't seem
to have resources to investigate properly, and this will be blocking
recomissioning of hosts if we don't get it out of the way.
Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson
Release-Acked-by: Ian Jackson
CC: Roger Pau Monné
---
allow.all | 1
Hi Juergen,
On 14/09/2021 13:35, Juergen Gross wrote:
Xenstore is referencing domains by their domid, but reuse of a domid
can lead to the situation that Xenstore can't tell whether a domain
with that domid has been deleted and created again without Xenstore
noticing the domain is a new one
On 22.11.21 11:28, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
>
> There are range sets which should not be printed, so introduce a flag
> which allows marking those as such. Implement relevant logic to skip
> such entries while printing.
>
> Suggested-by: Jan Beulich
>
tl;dr:
Commit moratorium is now in force until further notice
(which will be given tomorrow afternoon).
Jan Beulich writes ("Re: Xen 4.16 development update - tree status"):
> On 19.11.2021 16:15, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Tree status
> > ===
> >
> > We are now in deep code freeze,
On 22.11.21 13:08, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 22.11.2021 11:59, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>> On 22.11.21 12:54, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 22.11.2021 11:50, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
On 22.11.21 12:43, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 22.11.2021 11:27, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> On Mon,
On 22.11.2021 12:00, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 11:51:59AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 22.11.2021 11:40, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
>>> +### Added
>>> + - 32bit Arm builds to the gitlab-ci automated tests.
>>> + - x86 full system tests to the gitlab-ci automated tests.
>>> +
On 22.11.2021 11:59, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> On 22.11.21 12:54, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 22.11.2021 11:50, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>>>
>>> On 22.11.21 12:43, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 22.11.2021 11:27, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 11:28:25AM +0200,
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 11:51:59AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> (reducing Cc list)
>
> On 22.11.2021 11:40, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> > --- a/CHANGELOG.md
> > +++ b/CHANGELOG.md
> > @@ -21,6 +21,32 @@ The format is based on [Keep a
> > Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/)
> > -
On 22.11.21 12:54, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 22.11.2021 11:50, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>>
>> On 22.11.21 12:43, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 22.11.2021 11:27, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 11:28:25AM +0200, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> ---
On 22.11.2021 11:50, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>
>
> On 22.11.21 12:43, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 22.11.2021 11:27, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 11:28:25AM +0200, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
--- a/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c
+++ b/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 10:50:18AM +, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>
>
> On 22.11.21 12:43, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 22.11.2021 11:27, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 11:28:25AM +0200, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> >>> --- a/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c
> >>> +++
(reducing Cc list)
On 22.11.2021 11:40, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> --- a/CHANGELOG.md
> +++ b/CHANGELOG.md
> @@ -21,6 +21,32 @@ The format is based on [Keep a
> Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/)
> - qemu-traditional based device models (both, qemu-traditional and
> ioemu-stubdom)
On 22.11.21 12:43, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 22.11.2021 11:27, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 11:28:25AM +0200, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c
>>> +++ b/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c
>>> @@ -206,12 +206,16 @@ static void defer_map(struct domain
flight 166263 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/166263/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-i386-xsm 12 debian-hvm-install fail pass in
166256
Tests which did not
On 22.11.2021 11:27, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 11:28:25AM +0200, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>> --- a/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c
>> +++ b/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c
>> @@ -206,12 +206,16 @@ static void defer_map(struct domain *d, struct pci_dev
>> *pdev,
>> static int
On 14.09.2021 14:35, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Add a bitmap with one bit per possible domid indicating the respective
> domain has changed its state (created, deleted, dying, crashed,
> shutdown).
>
> Registering the VIRQ_DOM_EXC event will result in setting the bits for
> all existing domains and
Document some of the relevant changes during the 4.16 release cycle.
Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné
Release-Acked-by: Ian Jackson
---
Changes since v1:
- Add qemu-traditional and pvgrub notes.
- Expand vPMU support to note it's limited.
- xenstore library API changes.
- xencall2L addition.
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 11:28:25AM +0200, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
>
> Use a named range set instead of an anonymous one, but do not print it
> while dumping range sets for a domain.
>
> Suggested-by: Jan Beulich
> Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
>
Hi,
> On 19 Nov 2021, at 09:34, Oleksandr wrote:
>
>
> On 19.11.21 09:59, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>
> Hi Roger, all
>
>
>> On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 09:04:30PM +0200, Oleksandr wrote:
>>> On 18.11.21 19:33, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Roger
>>>
>>>
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at
On 14.09.2021 14:35, Juergen Gross wrote:
> --- a/xen/common/domain.c
> +++ b/xen/common/domain.c
> @@ -84,6 +84,9 @@ vcpu_info_t dummy_vcpu_info;
>
> bool __read_mostly vmtrace_available;
>
> +/* Unique domain identifier, protected by domctl lock. */
> +static uint64_t unique_id;
Unless a
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
There are range sets which should not be printed, so introduce a flag
which allows marking those as such. Implement relevant logic to skip
such entries while printing.
Suggested-by: Jan Beulich
Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
---
xen/common/rangeset.c
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
Use a named range set instead of an anonymous one, but do not print it
while dumping range sets for a domain.
Suggested-by: Jan Beulich
Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
---
xen/drivers/vpci/header.c | 6 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1
flight 166264 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/166264/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-armhf-libvirt 6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 151777
build-amd64-libvirt
> On 18 Nov 2021, at 10:35, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>
> On 18/11/2021 09:58, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 17.11.2021 17:48, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> There are several cases where the act of interrupting a remote processor has
>>> the required side effect. Explicitly allow NULL function pointers so
On 19.11.2021 19:21, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> do{_reserved,}_trap() should use fatal_trap() rather than opencoding part of
Nit: That's do{_unhandled,}_trap() now.
> it. This lets the remote stack trace logic work in more fatal error
> conditions.
>
> With do_trap() converted, there is only one
On 19.11.2021 19:21, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/entry.S
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/entry.S
> @@ -773,14 +773,48 @@ handle_exception_saved:
> sti
> 1: movq %rsp,%rdi
> movzbl UREGS_entry_vector(%rsp),%eax
> -leaq exception_table(%rip),%rdx
>
On 19.11.2021 19:21, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> NMI hooking in the crash path has undergone several revisions since its
> introduction. What we have now is not sufficiently different from the regular
> nmi_callback() mechanism to warrant special casing.
>
> Use set_nmi_callback() directly, and do
On 19.11.2021 19:21, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> The unconditional nmi_callback() call in do_nmi() calls dummy_nmi_callback()
> in all cases other than for a few specific and rare tasks (alternative
> patching, microcode loading, etc).
>
> Indirect calls are expensive under retpoline, so rearrange the
On 19.11.2021 19:21, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> This causes NMIs, #DB and #MC to be counted, rather than being reported as 0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich
On 22.11.2021 09:34, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> On 22.11.21 10:22, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 19.11.2021 15:23, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 02:56:12PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 05.11.2021 07:56, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
On 22.11.21 10:22, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 19.11.2021 15:23, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 02:56:12PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 05.11.2021 07:56, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
Hi, all!
This patch series is
On 22.11.21 10:24, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 19.11.2021 15:09, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>> On 19.11.21 15:57, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 19.11.2021 14:41, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
On 19.11.21 15:16, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 05.11.2021 07:56, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>>
On 19.11.2021 15:09, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> On 19.11.21 15:57, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 19.11.2021 14:41, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>>> On 19.11.21 15:16, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 05.11.2021 07:56, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> @@ -95,10 +102,25 @@ int
On 19.11.2021 15:23, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 02:56:12PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 05.11.2021 07:56, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>>> From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
>>>
>>> Hi, all!
>>>
>>> This patch series is focusing on vPCI and adds support for non-identity
>>>
On 22.10.21 08:47, Juergen Gross wrote:
Today the non-essential pv devices are hard coded in the xenbus driver
and this list is lacking multiple entries.
This series reworks the detection logic of non-essential devices by
adding a flag for that purpose to struct xenbus_driver.
Juergen Gross
On 19.11.2021 16:15, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Tree status
> ===
>
> We are now in deep code freeze, during which we will try to discover
> and eliminate serious bugs and regressions.
>
> All patches other than documentation patches need a Release-Ack.
> Fixes for serious bugs, and test
On 19.11.2021 17:52, Ayan Kumar Halder wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/decode.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/decode.c
> @@ -84,6 +84,80 @@ bad_thumb2:
> return 1;
> }
>
> +static inline int32_t extract32(uint32_t value, int start, int length)
> +{
> +int32_t ret;
> +
> +if ( !(start >= 0 &&
On 20.11.2021 02:41, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Nov 2021, Ayan Kumar Halder wrote:
>> +static int decode_64bit_loadstore_postindexing(register_t pc, struct
>> hsr_dabt *dabt)
>> +{
>> +uint32_t instr;
>> +int size;
>> +int v;
>> +int opc;
>> +int rt;
>> +int
On 19.11.2021 18:09, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [PATCH for-4.16 v3] efi: fix alignment of function
> parameters in compat mode"):
>> Some hardtabs appear to have slipped in.
>
> Thanks. Fixed.
>
>> Jan gave a conditional R-by which permitted a change along these lines,
>>
89 matches
Mail list logo
