On 6/24/2021 7:48 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> Ok, diff below which attempts to tackle the offset issue I mentioned as
> well. Qian Cai -- please can you try with these changes?
This works fine.
>
> Will
>
> --->8
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/swiotlb.h b/incl
On 6/18/2021 11:40 PM, Claire Chang wrote:
> Propagate the swiotlb_force into io_tlb_default_mem->force_bounce and
> use it to determine whether to bounce the data or not. This will be
> useful later to allow for different pools.
>
> Signed-off-by: Claire Chang
> Reviewed-by: Christoph
On 6/23/2021 2:37 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 12:39:29PM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 6/18/2021 11:40 PM, Claire Chang wrote:
>>> Propagate the swiotlb_force into io_tlb_default_mem->force_bounce and
>>> use
On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 13:16 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> This is the second version of providing a base to support device MSI (non
> PCI based) and on top of that support for IMS (Interrupt Message Storm)
> based devices in a halfways architecture independent way.
>
> The first version can be
On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 13:17 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> From: Thomas Gleixner
>
> The arch_.*_msi_irq[s] fallbacks are compiled in whether an architecture
> requires them or not. Architectures which are fully utilizing hierarchical
> irq domains should never call into that code.
>
> It's
