On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 at 15:30, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> From: David Woodhouse
>
> Coverity couldn't see that nr_existing was always going to be zero when
> qemu_xen_xs_directory() returned NULL in the ENOENT case (CID 1523906).
>
> Perhaps more to the point, neither could Peter at first glance.
On 09/11/2023 15:30, David Woodhouse wrote:
From: David Woodhouse
Coverity couldn't see that nr_existing was always going to be zero when
qemu_xen_xs_directory() returned NULL in the ENOENT case (CID 1523906).
Perhaps more to the point, neither could Peter at first glance. Improve
the code to
From: David Woodhouse
Coverity couldn't see that nr_existing was always going to be zero when
qemu_xen_xs_directory() returned NULL in the ENOENT case (CID 1523906).
Perhaps more to the point, neither could Peter at first glance. Improve
the code to hopefully make it clearer to Coverity and