On 02/04/24 18:09, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 02/04/2024 5:06 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 02.04.2024 17:54, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 02/04/2024 4:46 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 02.04.2024 17:43, Andrew Cooper wrote:
MISRA Rule 13.6 doesn't like having an expression in a sizeof() which
potentially
On 02/04/24 17:54, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 02/04/2024 4:46 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 02.04.2024 17:43, Andrew Cooper wrote:
MISRA Rule 13.6 doesn't like having an expression in a sizeof() which
potentially has side effects.
Address several violations by pulling the expression out into a local
On 02/04/2024 5:06 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 02.04.2024 17:54, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 02/04/2024 4:46 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 02.04.2024 17:43, Andrew Cooper wrote:
MISRA Rule 13.6 doesn't like having an expression in a sizeof() which
potentially has side effects.
On 02.04.2024 17:54, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 02/04/2024 4:46 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 02.04.2024 17:43, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> MISRA Rule 13.6 doesn't like having an expression in a sizeof() which
>>> potentially has side effects.
>>>
>>> Address several violations by pulling the
On 02/04/2024 4:46 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 02.04.2024 17:43, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> MISRA Rule 13.6 doesn't like having an expression in a sizeof() which
>> potentially has side effects.
>>
>> Address several violations by pulling the expression out into a local
>> variable.
>>
>> No
On 02.04.2024 17:43, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> MISRA Rule 13.6 doesn't like having an expression in a sizeof() which
> potentially has side effects.
>
> Address several violations by pulling the expression out into a local
> variable.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
MISRA Rule 13.6 doesn't like having an expression in a sizeof() which
potentially has side effects.
Address several violations by pulling the expression out into a local
variable.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
---
CC: Jan Beulich
CC: Roger Pau Monné
CC: Stefano