Re: [PATCH] x86: Fix AMD_SVM and INTEL_VMX dependency

2025-09-01 Thread Orzel, Michal
On 01/09/2025 13:19, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 01.09.2025 12:43, Michal Orzel wrote: >> Commit e3ed540f2e9f was meant to make AMD_SVM dependent on AMD and >> INTEL_VMX on INTEL. Such dependency should be done using 'depends on' >> and not 'if' next to prompt that deals only with the visibility of

Re: [PATCH] x86: Fix AMD_SVM and INTEL_VMX dependency

2025-09-01 Thread Jan Beulich
On 01.09.2025 13:25, Orzel, Michal wrote: > > > On 01/09/2025 13:19, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 01.09.2025 12:43, Michal Orzel wrote: >>> Commit e3ed540f2e9f was meant to make AMD_SVM dependent on AMD and >>> INTEL_VMX on INTEL. Such dependency should be done using 'depends on' >>> and not 'if' nex

Re: [PATCH] x86: Fix AMD_SVM and INTEL_VMX dependency

2025-09-01 Thread Jan Beulich
On 01.09.2025 12:43, Michal Orzel wrote: > Commit e3ed540f2e9f was meant to make AMD_SVM dependent on AMD and > INTEL_VMX on INTEL. Such dependency should be done using 'depends on' > and not 'if' next to prompt that deals only with the visibility of the > given Kconfig option. This makes it imposs

[PATCH] x86: Fix AMD_SVM and INTEL_VMX dependency

2025-09-01 Thread Michal Orzel
Commit e3ed540f2e9f was meant to make AMD_SVM dependent on AMD and INTEL_VMX on INTEL. Such dependency should be done using 'depends on' and not 'if' next to prompt that deals only with the visibility of the given Kconfig option. This makes it impossible to e.g. disable INTEL_VMX when INTEL is disa