On 27/08/2021 15:07, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 27.08.2021 16:01, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> As explained in the comments, a progress label wants to be before the
>> function
>> it refers to for the higher level logic to make sense. As it happens, the
>> effects are benign because gnttab_mappings is im
On 27.08.2021 16:01, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> As explained in the comments, a progress label wants to be before the function
> it refers to for the higher level logic to make sense. As it happens, the
> effects are benign because gnttab_mappings is immediately adjacent to teardown
> in terms of co-r
As explained in the comments, a progress label wants to be before the function
it refers to for the higher level logic to make sense. As it happens, the
effects are benign because gnttab_mappings is immediately adjacent to teardown
in terms of co-routine exit points.
There is and will always be a
