On Wed, Mar 1, 2023, 12:36 AM Markus Armbruster wrote:
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" writes:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 09:05:16PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> >> Well, without CI, I assume that the code will bitrot quite fast
> (considering
> >> that there are continuous improvements to TCG, for
"Michael S. Tsirkin" writes:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 09:05:16PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> Well, without CI, I assume that the code will bitrot quite fast (considering
>> that there are continuous improvements to TCG, for example).
>
> We have lots of hosts which we don't test with CI. They
On 28/02/2023 22.32, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 09:05:16PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
Well, without CI, I assume that the code will bitrot quite fast (considering
that there are continuous improvements to TCG, for example).
We have lots of hosts which we don't test with
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 09:05:16PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> Well, without CI, I assume that the code will bitrot quite fast (considering
> that there are continuous improvements to TCG, for example).
We have lots of hosts which we don't test with CI. They don't bitrot
because people do
On 28/02/2023 10.01, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 08:39:49AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 27/02/2023 19.38, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 12:10:48PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
We're struggling quite badly with our CI minutes on the shared
gitlab
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 09:01:46AM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> If we're merely wanting to drop CI support, we can do that any time and
> deprecation is not required/expected. We should only be using deprecation
> where we're explicitly intending that the code will cease to work.
Good
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 08:39:49AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 27/02/2023 19.38, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 12:10:48PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > > We're struggling quite badly with our CI minutes on the shared
> > > gitlab runners, so we urgently need to think of
On 27/02/2023 19.38, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 12:10:48PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
We're struggling quite badly with our CI minutes on the shared
gitlab runners, so we urgently need to think of ways to cut down
our supported build and target environments.
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 12:10:48PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> We're struggling quite badly with our CI minutes on the shared
> gitlab runners, so we urgently need to think of ways to cut down
> our supported build and target environments. qemu-system-i386 and
> qemu-system-arm are not really
We're struggling quite badly with our CI minutes on the shared
gitlab runners, so we urgently need to think of ways to cut down
our supported build and target environments. qemu-system-i386 and
qemu-system-arm are not really required anymore, since nobody uses
KVM on the corresponding systems for
10 matches
Mail list logo
