Re: [PATCH 03/10] x86emul: extend decoding / mem access testing to MMX / SSE insns

2020-08-04 Thread Jan Beulich
On 03.08.2020 18:42, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 03/08/2020 15:50, Jan Beulich wrote: >> IOW just legacy encoded ones. For 3dNow! just one example is used, as >> they're all similar in nature both encoding- and operand-wise. >> >> Adjust a slightly misleading (but not wrong) memcpy() invocation, as

Re: [PATCH 03/10] x86emul: extend decoding / mem access testing to MMX / SSE insns

2020-08-03 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 03/08/2020 15:50, Jan Beulich wrote: > IOW just legacy encoded ones. For 3dNow! just one example is used, as > they're all similar in nature both encoding- and operand-wise. > > Adjust a slightly misleading (but not wrong) memcpy() invocation, as > noticed while further cloning that code. I

[PATCH 03/10] x86emul: extend decoding / mem access testing to MMX / SSE insns

2020-08-03 Thread Jan Beulich
IOW just legacy encoded ones. For 3dNow! just one example is used, as they're all similar in nature both encoding- and operand-wise. Adjust a slightly misleading (but not wrong) memcpy() invocation, as noticed while further cloning that code. Rename pfx_none to pfx_no, so it can be used to