Re: [PATCH 1/8] x86/spec-ctrl: Fix confusion between SPEC_CTRL_EXIT_TO_XEN{,_IST}

On 14/09/2023 7:56 am, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 13.09.2023 22:27, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> c/s 3fffaf9c13e9 ("x86/entry: Avoid using alternatives in NMI/#MC paths") >> dropped the only user, leaving behind the (incorrect) implication that Xen >> had >> split exit paths. >> >> Delete the unused

Re: [PATCH 1/8] x86/spec-ctrl: Fix confusion between SPEC_CTRL_EXIT_TO_XEN{,_IST}

On 13.09.2023 22:27, Andrew Cooper wrote: > c/s 3fffaf9c13e9 ("x86/entry: Avoid using alternatives in NMI/#MC paths") > dropped the only user, leaving behind the (incorrect) implication that Xen had > split exit paths. > > Delete the unused SPEC_CTRL_EXIT_TO_XEN and rename

[PATCH 1/8] x86/spec-ctrl: Fix confusion between SPEC_CTRL_EXIT_TO_XEN{,_IST}

c/s 3fffaf9c13e9 ("x86/entry: Avoid using alternatives in NMI/#MC paths") dropped the only user, leaving behind the (incorrect) implication that Xen had split exit paths. Delete the unused SPEC_CTRL_EXIT_TO_XEN and rename SPEC_CTRL_EXIT_TO_XEN_IST to SPEC_CTRL_EXIT_TO_XEN for consistency. No