Re: [PATCH 16/16] x86/P2M: the majority for struct p2m_domain's fields are HVM-only

On 14.02.2022 17:07, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 14.02.2022 16:51, George Dunlap wrote: >>> On Jul 5, 2021, at 5:15 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> >>> ..., as are the majority of the locks involved. Conditionalize things >>> accordingly. >>> >>> Also adjust the ioreq field's indentation at this occasion.

Re: [PATCH 16/16] x86/P2M: the majority for struct p2m_domain's fields are HVM-only

On 14.02.2022 16:51, George Dunlap wrote: > > >> On Jul 5, 2021, at 5:15 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >> ..., as are the majority of the locks involved. Conditionalize things >> accordingly. >> >> Also adjust the ioreq field's indentation at this occasion. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich > >

Re: [PATCH 16/16] x86/P2M: the majority for struct p2m_domain's fields are HVM-only

> On Jul 5, 2021, at 5:15 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: > > ..., as are the majority of the locks involved. Conditionalize things > accordingly. > > Also adjust the ioreq field's indentation at this occasion. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich Reviewed-by: George Dunlap With one question… > @@

Re: [PATCH 16/16] x86/P2M: the majority for struct p2m_domain's fields are HVM-only

On 05/07/2021 17:15, Jan Beulich wrote: ..., as are the majority of the locks involved. Conditionalize things accordingly. Also adjust the ioreq field's indentation at this occasion. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant

[PATCH 16/16] x86/P2M: the majority for struct p2m_domain's fields are HVM-only

..., as are the majority of the locks involved. Conditionalize things accordingly. Also adjust the ioreq field's indentation at this occasion. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c @@ -481,8 +481,11 @@ unsigned int page_get_ram_type(mfn_t mfn unsigned