Re: [PATCH 4/5] xen/wait: Remove indirect jump

2021-11-12 Thread Jan Beulich
On 11.11.2021 18:57, Andrew Cooper wrote: > There is no need for this to be an indirect jump at all. Execution always > returns to a specific location, so use a direct jump instead. > > Use a named label for the jump. As both 1 and 2 have disappeared as labels, > rename 3 to skip to better

[PATCH 4/5] xen/wait: Remove indirect jump

2021-11-11 Thread Andrew Cooper
There is no need for this to be an indirect jump at all. Execution always returns to a specific location, so use a direct jump instead. Use a named label for the jump. As both 1 and 2 have disappeared as labels, rename 3 to skip to better describe its purpose. Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper ---