On 23/05/2024 5:16 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 23.05.2024 13:16, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> First, if XSAVE is available in hardware but not visible to the guest, the
>> dynamic leaves shouldn't be filled in.
>>
>> Second, the comment concerning XSS state is wrong. VT-x doesn't manage
>> host/guest s
On 23.05.2024 13:16, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> First, if XSAVE is available in hardware but not visible to the guest, the
> dynamic leaves shouldn't be filled in.
>
> Second, the comment concerning XSS state is wrong. VT-x doesn't manage
> host/guest state automatically, but there is provision for "
First, if XSAVE is available in hardware but not visible to the guest, the
dynamic leaves shouldn't be filled in.
Second, the comment concerning XSS state is wrong. VT-x doesn't manage
host/guest state automatically, but there is provision for "host only" bits to
be set, so the implications are s
