On 26.06.2020 17:03, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 04:19:36PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 26.06.2020 15:40, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 25.06.2020 18:10, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 11:05:52AM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 04:19:36PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 26.06.2020 15:40, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 25.06.2020 18:10, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 11:05:52AM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 04:01:44PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On
On 26.06.2020 15:40, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 25.06.2020 18:10, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 11:05:52AM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 04:01:44PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 24.06.2020 15:41, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 24/06/2020 11:12, Jan
On 25.06.2020 18:10, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 11:05:52AM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 04:01:44PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 24.06.2020 15:41, Julien Grall wrote:
On 24/06/2020 11:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 23.06.2020 19:26, Roger
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 11:05:52AM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 04:01:44PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 24.06.2020 15:41, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > On 24/06/2020 11:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >> On 23.06.2020 19:26, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > >>> I'm confused.
Hi Jan,
On 24/06/2020 15:01, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 24.06.2020 15:41, Julien Grall wrote:
On 24/06/2020 11:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 23.06.2020 19:26, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
I'm confused. Couldn't we switch from uint64_aligned_t to plain
uint64_t (like it's currently on the Linux headers),
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 04:01:44PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 24.06.2020 15:41, Julien Grall wrote:
> > On 24/06/2020 11:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 23.06.2020 19:26, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >>> I'm confused. Couldn't we switch from uint64_aligned_t to plain
> >>> uint64_t (like it's
On 24.06.2020 15:41, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 24/06/2020 11:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 23.06.2020 19:26, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> I'm confused. Couldn't we switch from uint64_aligned_t to plain
>>> uint64_t (like it's currently on the Linux headers), and then use the
>>> compat layer in Xen to
Hi Jan,
On 24/06/2020 11:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 23.06.2020 19:26, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 06:18:52PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 23.06.2020 17:56, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 05:02:04PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 23.06.2020 15:52, Roger Pau
>> ; Ian Jackson
>> ; Stefano Stabellini ;
>> Wei Liu
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH for-4.14] mm: fix public declaration of struct
>> xen_mem_acquire_resource
>>
>> On 24.06.2020 14:47, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 24/06/2020 13:
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Beulich
> Sent: 24 June 2020 13:52
> To: Julien Grall
> Cc: Roger Pau Monné ; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org;
> p...@xen.org; Andrew
> Cooper ; George Dunlap ;
> Ian Jackson
> ; Stefano Stabellini ; Wei
> Liu
> Subj
On 24.06.2020 14:47, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 24/06/2020 13:08, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 24.06.2020 12:52, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> Hi Jan,
>>>
>>> On 24/06/2020 11:05, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 23.06.2020 19:32, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 05:04:53PM +0200, Jan
Hi,
On 24/06/2020 13:08, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 24.06.2020 12:52, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Jan,
On 24/06/2020 11:05, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 23.06.2020 19:32, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 05:04:53PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 23.06.2020 15:52, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
On 24.06.2020 12:52, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> On 24/06/2020 11:05, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 23.06.2020 19:32, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 05:04:53PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 23.06.2020 15:52, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> XENMEM_acquire_resource and it's
Hi Jan,
On 24/06/2020 11:05, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 23.06.2020 19:32, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 05:04:53PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 23.06.2020 15:52, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
XENMEM_acquire_resource and it's related structure is currently inside
a __XEN__ or
On 23.06.2020 19:26, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 06:18:52PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 23.06.2020 17:56, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 05:02:04PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 23.06.2020 15:52, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> XENMEM_acquire_resource
On 23.06.2020 19:32, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 05:04:53PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 23.06.2020 15:52, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
>>> XENMEM_acquire_resource and it's related structure is currently inside
>>> a __XEN__ or __XEN_TOOLS__ guarded section to limit it's scope to
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 05:04:53PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 23.06.2020 15:52, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> > XENMEM_acquire_resource and it's related structure is currently inside
> > a __XEN__ or __XEN_TOOLS__ guarded section to limit it's scope to the
> > hypervisor or the toolstack only. This
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 06:18:52PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 23.06.2020 17:56, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 05:02:04PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 23.06.2020 15:52, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> >>> XENMEM_acquire_resource and it's related structure is currently inside
On 23.06.2020 17:56, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 05:02:04PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 23.06.2020 15:52, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
>>> XENMEM_acquire_resource and it's related structure is currently inside
>>> a __XEN__ or __XEN_TOOLS__ guarded section to limit it's scope to
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 05:02:04PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 23.06.2020 15:52, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> > XENMEM_acquire_resource and it's related structure is currently inside
> > a __XEN__ or __XEN_TOOLS__ guarded section to limit it's scope to the
> > hypervisor or the toolstack only. This
On 23.06.2020 15:52, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> XENMEM_acquire_resource and it's related structure is currently inside
> a __XEN__ or __XEN_TOOLS__ guarded section to limit it's scope to the
> hypervisor or the toolstack only. This is wrong as the hypercall is
> already being used by the Linux
On 23.06.2020 15:52, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> XENMEM_acquire_resource and it's related structure is currently inside
> a __XEN__ or __XEN_TOOLS__ guarded section to limit it's scope to the
> hypervisor or the toolstack only. This is wrong as the hypercall is
> already being used by the Linux
On 23/06/2020 14:52, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
XENMEM_acquire_resource and it's related structure is currently inside
a __XEN__ or __XEN_TOOLS__ guarded section to limit it's scope to the
hypervisor or the toolstack only. This is wrong as the hypercall is
already being used by the Linux kernel
; Wei
> Liu
> Subject: [PATCH for-4.14] mm: fix public declaration of struct
> xen_mem_acquire_resource
>
> XENMEM_acquire_resource and it's related structure is currently inside
> a __XEN__ or __XEN_TOOLS__ guarded section to limit it's scope to the
> hypervisor or the toolstac
XENMEM_acquire_resource and it's related structure is currently inside
a __XEN__ or __XEN_TOOLS__ guarded section to limit it's scope to the
hypervisor or the toolstack only. This is wrong as the hypercall is
already being used by the Linux kernel at least, and as such needs to
be public.
Also
26 matches
Mail list logo