Hi Roger,
On 4/30/24 10:34 AM, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> None of the implementations support set_foreign_p2m_entry() yet, neither they
> have a p2m walk in domain_relinquish_resources() in order to remove the
> foreign
> mappings from the p2m and thus drop the extra refcounts.
>
> Adjust the
On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 10:46:12AM +0200, Oleksii wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-04-30 at 17:34 +0200, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> > None of the implementations support set_foreign_p2m_entry() yet,
> > neither they
> > have a p2m walk in domain_relinquish_resources() in order to remove
> > the foreign
> >
On Tue, 2024-04-30 at 17:34 +0200, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> None of the implementations support set_foreign_p2m_entry() yet,
> neither they
> have a p2m walk in domain_relinquish_resources() in order to remove
> the foreign
> mappings from the p2m and thus drop the extra refcounts.
>
> Adjust the
On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 09:23:30AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 30.04.2024 17:34, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> > None of the implementations support set_foreign_p2m_entry() yet, neither
> > they
> > have a p2m walk in domain_relinquish_resources() in order to remove the
> > foreign
> > mappings
On 30.04.2024 17:34, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> None of the implementations support set_foreign_p2m_entry() yet, neither they
> have a p2m walk in domain_relinquish_resources() in order to remove the
> foreign
> mappings from the p2m and thus drop the extra refcounts.
While I don't mind the cod
None of the implementations support set_foreign_p2m_entry() yet, neither they
have a p2m walk in domain_relinquish_resources() in order to remove the foreign
mappings from the p2m and thus drop the extra refcounts.
Adjust the arch helpers to return false and introduce a comment that clearly
