On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 05:12:28PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
...
> Huh. powerpc actually has some crazy code in __switch_to() that is
> supposed to handle preemption while in lazy mmu mode. So we probably
> don't even need to disable preemption, just use the raw per-cpu
> accessors (or keep dis
On Tue Apr 8, 2025 at 1:11 AM AEST, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This series is an attempt to fix the violation of lazy MMU mode context
> requirement as described for arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode():
>
> This mode can only be entered and left under the protection of
> the page table l
On Mon, 7 Apr 2025 17:11:26 +0200 Alexander Gordeev
wrote:
> This series is an attempt to fix the violation of lazy MMU mode context
> requirement as described for arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode():
>
> This mode can only be entered and left under the protection of
> the page table locks for
Hi All,
This series is an attempt to fix the violation of lazy MMU mode context
requirement as described for arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode():
This mode can only be entered and left under the protection of
the page table locks for all page tables which may be modified.
On s390 if I make arch_e
