My apologies for the delay on this and thank you for reaching to me for
the ping, Oleksii.
Acked-by: Shawn Anastasio
On 11/27/23 4:26 AM, Oleksii wrote:
> Hello Shawn,
>
> Could you kindly review the patch when you have a moment?
> It can help with merging other patch series.
>
> Thanks in
Hello Shawn,
Could you kindly review the patch when you have a moment?
It can help with merging other patch series.
Thanks in advance.
~ Oleksii
On Tue, 2023-10-31 at 16:28 +0200, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
> only declares udelay() function so udelay()
> declaration was moved to xen/delay.h.
>
On Wed, 2023-11-15 at 11:24 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 31.10.2023 15:28, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
> > only declares udelay() function so udelay()
> > declaration was moved to xen/delay.h.
> >
> > For x86, __udelay() was renamed to udelay() and removed
> > inclusion of in x86 code.
> >
> >
On 31.10.2023 15:28, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
> only declares udelay() function so udelay()
> declaration was moved to xen/delay.h.
>
> For x86, __udelay() was renamed to udelay() and removed
> inclusion of in x86 code.
>
> For ppc, udelay() stub definition was moved to ppc/stubs.c.
>
>
On Fri, 2023-11-10 at 10:33 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 10.11.2023 10:30, Oleksii wrote:
> > On Tue, 2023-10-31 at 16:28 +0200, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
> > > only declares udelay() function so udelay()
> > > declaration was moved to xen/delay.h.
> > >
> > > For x86, __udelay() was renamed to
On 10.11.2023 10:30, Oleksii wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-10-31 at 16:28 +0200, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
>> only declares udelay() function so udelay()
>> declaration was moved to xen/delay.h.
>>
>> For x86, __udelay() was renamed to udelay() and removed
>> inclusion of in x86 code.
>>
>> For ppc,
Hi all,
On Tue, 2023-10-31 at 16:28 +0200, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
> only declares udelay() function so udelay()
> declaration was moved to xen/delay.h.
>
> For x86, __udelay() was renamed to udelay() and removed
> inclusion of in x86 code.
>
> For ppc, udelay() stub definition was moved to
On 31/10/2023 14:28, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
only declares udelay() function so udelay()
declaration was moved to xen/delay.h.
For x86, __udelay() was renamed to udelay() and removed
inclusion of in x86 code.
For ppc, udelay() stub definition was moved to ppc/stubs.c.
Suggested-by: Jan
only declares udelay() function so udelay()
declaration was moved to xen/delay.h.
For x86, __udelay() was renamed to udelay() and removed
inclusion of in x86 code.
For ppc, udelay() stub definition was moved to ppc/stubs.c.
Suggested-by: Jan Beulich
Signed-off-by: Oleksii Kurochko
On Tue, 6 Dec 2022, Michal Orzel wrote:
> MISRA C rule 4.2 states that trigraphs (sequences of two question marks
> followed by a specified third character [=/'()!<>-]) should not be used.
> This applies to both code and comments. Thankfully, we do not use them
> in the code, but still there are
MISRA C rule 4.2 states that trigraphs (sequences of two question marks
followed by a specified third character [=/'()!<>-]) should not be used.
This applies to both code and comments. Thankfully, we do not use them
in the code, but still there are some comments where they are
accidentally used.
On 31/05/2019 06:06, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 31.05.19 at 13:53, wrote:
>> The "allbutself" cpumask in stop_machine_run() is not needed. Instead
>> of allocating it on the stack it can easily be avoided.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross
> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich
LGTM. Acked-by: Andrew
>>> On 31.05.19 at 13:53, wrote:
> The "allbutself" cpumask in stop_machine_run() is not needed. Instead
> of allocating it on the stack it can easily be avoided.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich
with one further remark:
> --- a/xen/common/stop_machine.c
> +++
The "allbutself" cpumask in stop_machine_run() is not needed. Instead
of allocating it on the stack it can easily be avoided.
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross
---
xen/common/stop_machine.c | 13 +++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/common/stop_machine.c
14 matches
Mail list logo
