Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] xen+tools: Introduce XEN_SYSCTL_PHYSCAP_vpmu

2021-10-07 Thread Jan Beulich
On 07.10.2021 10:02, Michal Orzel wrote: > On 07.10.2021 09:59, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 06.10.2021 12:58, Michal Orzel wrote: >>> Introduce flag XEN_SYSCTL_PHYSCAP_vpmu which >>> indicates whether the platform supports vPMU >>> functionality. Modify Xen and tools accordingly. >>> >>> Take the

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] xen+tools: Introduce XEN_SYSCTL_PHYSCAP_vpmu

2021-10-07 Thread Michal Orzel
Hi, On 07.10.2021 09:59, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 06.10.2021 12:58, Michal Orzel wrote: >> Introduce flag XEN_SYSCTL_PHYSCAP_vpmu which >> indicates whether the platform supports vPMU >> functionality. Modify Xen and tools accordingly. >> >> Take the opportunity and fix XEN_SYSCTL_PHYSCAP_vmtrace

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] xen+tools: Introduce XEN_SYSCTL_PHYSCAP_vpmu

2021-10-07 Thread Jan Beulich
On 06.10.2021 12:58, Michal Orzel wrote: > Introduce flag XEN_SYSCTL_PHYSCAP_vpmu which > indicates whether the platform supports vPMU > functionality. Modify Xen and tools accordingly. > > Take the opportunity and fix XEN_SYSCTL_PHYSCAP_vmtrace > definition in sysctl.h which wrongly uses (1<<6)

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] xen+tools: Introduce XEN_SYSCTL_PHYSCAP_vpmu

2021-10-06 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Wed, 6 Oct 2021, Michal Orzel wrote: > Introduce flag XEN_SYSCTL_PHYSCAP_vpmu which > indicates whether the platform supports vPMU > functionality. Modify Xen and tools accordingly. > > Take the opportunity and fix XEN_SYSCTL_PHYSCAP_vmtrace > definition in sysctl.h which wrongly uses (1<<6) >

[PATCH v2 1/3] xen+tools: Introduce XEN_SYSCTL_PHYSCAP_vpmu

2021-10-06 Thread Michal Orzel
Introduce flag XEN_SYSCTL_PHYSCAP_vpmu which indicates whether the platform supports vPMU functionality. Modify Xen and tools accordingly. Take the opportunity and fix XEN_SYSCTL_PHYSCAP_vmtrace definition in sysctl.h which wrongly uses (1<<6) instead of (1u<<6) and does not follow the standard