On 07.10.2021 10:21, Michal Orzel wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> On 07.10.2021 10:03, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 06.10.2021 12:58, Michal Orzel wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
>>> @@ -692,6 +692,12 @@ int arch_sanitise_domain_config(struct
>>> xen_domctl_createdomain
Hi Jan,
On 07.10.2021 10:03, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 06.10.2021 12:58, Michal Orzel wrote:
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
>> @@ -692,6 +692,12 @@ int arch_sanitise_domain_config(struct
>> xen_domctl_createdomain *config)
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
On 06.10.2021 12:58, Michal Orzel wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
> @@ -692,6 +692,12 @@ int arch_sanitise_domain_config(struct
> xen_domctl_createdomain *config)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> +if ( config->flags & XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_vpmu )
> +{
On 6 Oct 2021, at 11:58, Michal Orzel
mailto:michal.or...@arm.com>> wrote:
Add parameter vpmu to xl domain configuration syntax
to enable the access to PMU registers by disabling
the PMU traps(currently only for ARM).
The current status is that the PMU registers are not
virtualized and the
Add parameter vpmu to xl domain configuration syntax
to enable the access to PMU registers by disabling
the PMU traps(currently only for ARM).
The current status is that the PMU registers are not
virtualized and the physical registers are directly
accessible when this parameter is enabled. There
