On 12.01.2023 13:08, Xenia Ragiadakou wrote:
> On 1/12/23 13:37, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 04.01.2023 09:44, Xenia Ragiadakou wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
>>> @@ -140,8 +140,22 @@ extern u32 pmtmr_ioport;
>>> extern unsigned int
On 1/12/23 13:37, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 04.01.2023 09:44, Xenia Ragiadakou wrote:
The functions acpi_dmar_init() and acpi_dmar_zap/reinstate() are
VT-d specific while the function acpi_ivrs_init() is AMD-Vi specific.
To eliminate dead code, they need to be guarded under CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU
and
On 04.01.2023 09:44, Xenia Ragiadakou wrote:
> The functions acpi_dmar_init() and acpi_dmar_zap/reinstate() are
> VT-d specific while the function acpi_ivrs_init() is AMD-Vi specific.
> To eliminate dead code, they need to be guarded under CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU
> and CONFIG_AMD_IOMMU, respectively.
>
The functions acpi_dmar_init() and acpi_dmar_zap/reinstate() are
VT-d specific while the function acpi_ivrs_init() is AMD-Vi specific.
To eliminate dead code, they need to be guarded under CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU
and CONFIG_AMD_IOMMU, respectively.
Instead of adding #ifdef guards around the function
