On Fri Apr 18, 2025 at 10:16 PM BST, dmkhn wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 01:48:23PM +0100, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
>> From: "Daniel P. Smith"
>>
>> Add a container for the "cooked" command line for a domain. This
>> provides for the backing memory to be directly associated with the
>> domain
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 01:48:23PM +0100, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
> From: "Daniel P. Smith"
>
> Add a container for the "cooked" command line for a domain. This
> provides for the backing memory to be directly associated with the
> domain being constructed. This is done in anticipation that the
On Thu Apr 17, 2025 at 3:54 PM BST, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 17.04.2025 14:48, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
>> From: "Daniel P. Smith"
>>
>> Add a container for the "cooked" command line for a domain. This
>> provides for the backing memory to be directly associated with the
>> domain being constructe
On 17.04.2025 14:48, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
> From: "Daniel P. Smith"
>
> Add a container for the "cooked" command line for a domain. This
> provides for the backing memory to be directly associated with the
> domain being constructed. This is done in anticipation that the domain
> constructio
From: "Daniel P. Smith"
Add a container for the "cooked" command line for a domain. This
provides for the backing memory to be directly associated with the
domain being constructed. This is done in anticipation that the domain
construction path may need to be invoked multiple times, thus ensurin
