Re: [PATCH v6 20/20] irqdomain: Switch to per-domain locking

2023-03-07 Thread David Woodhouse
On Tue, 2023-03-07 at 15:06 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 07.03.23 14:51, David Woodhouse wrote: > > On Mon, 2023-02-13 at 11:43 +0100, Johan Hovold wrote: > > > The IRQ domain structures are currently protected by the global > > > irq_domain_mutex. Switch to using more fine-grained per-domain

Re: [PATCH v6 20/20] irqdomain: Switch to per-domain locking

2023-03-07 Thread Juergen Gross
On 07.03.23 14:51, David Woodhouse wrote: On Mon, 2023-02-13 at 11:43 +0100, Johan Hovold wrote: The IRQ domain structures are currently protected by the global irq_domain_mutex. Switch to using more fine-grained per-domain locking, which can speed up parallel probing by reducing lock

Re: [PATCH v6 20/20] irqdomain: Switch to per-domain locking

2023-03-07 Thread David Woodhouse
On Mon, 2023-02-13 at 11:43 +0100, Johan Hovold wrote: > The IRQ domain structures are currently protected by the global > irq_domain_mutex. Switch to using more fine-grained per-domain locking, > which can speed up parallel probing by reducing lock contention. > > On a recent arm64 laptop, the