Re: [RFC PATCH] xen: Introduce extra IRQ count domain creation parameter

2025-05-20 Thread Roger Pau Monné
On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 01:50:25PM +, Teddy Astie wrote: > When doing PCI Passthrough with high-IRQ devices (e.g NVMe drives), > the default limit may be unefficient as not all domains requires > more IRQs. > > Introduce a new parameter to allow the toolstack to tune the IRQ > count if more is

Re: [RFC PATCH] xen: Introduce extra IRQ count domain creation parameter

2025-05-18 Thread Jan Beulich
On 16.05.2025 15:50, Teddy Astie wrote: > When doing PCI Passthrough with high-IRQ devices (e.g NVMe drives), > the default limit may be unefficient as not all domains requires > more IRQs. > > Introduce a new parameter to allow the toolstack to tune the IRQ > count if more is required. > > Signe

[RFC PATCH] xen: Introduce extra IRQ count domain creation parameter

2025-05-16 Thread Teddy Astie
When doing PCI Passthrough with high-IRQ devices (e.g NVMe drives), the default limit may be unefficient as not all domains requires more IRQs. Introduce a new parameter to allow the toolstack to tune the IRQ count if more is required. Signed-off-by: Teddy Astie --- 0 extra_irqs is meaningful, t