On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 01:50:25PM +, Teddy Astie wrote:
> When doing PCI Passthrough with high-IRQ devices (e.g NVMe drives),
> the default limit may be unefficient as not all domains requires
> more IRQs.
>
> Introduce a new parameter to allow the toolstack to tune the IRQ
> count if more is
On 16.05.2025 15:50, Teddy Astie wrote:
> When doing PCI Passthrough with high-IRQ devices (e.g NVMe drives),
> the default limit may be unefficient as not all domains requires
> more IRQs.
>
> Introduce a new parameter to allow the toolstack to tune the IRQ
> count if more is required.
>
> Signe
When doing PCI Passthrough with high-IRQ devices (e.g NVMe drives),
the default limit may be unefficient as not all domains requires
more IRQs.
Introduce a new parameter to allow the toolstack to tune the IRQ
count if more is required.
Signed-off-by: Teddy Astie
---
0 extra_irqs is meaningful, t