On 31.08.2022 16:11, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote:
> There are number of cases where pcidevs_lock() is used to protect
> something that is not related to PCI devices per se.
>
> Probably pcidev_lock in these places should be replaced with some
> other lock.
>
> This patch is not intended to be merged
Hi Stefano,
Stefano Stabellini writes:
> On Wed, 31 Aug 2022, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote:
>> There are number of cases where pcidevs_lock() is used to protect
>> something that is not related to PCI devices per se.
>>
>> Probably pcidev_lock in these places should be replaced with some
>> other
On Wed, 31 Aug 2022, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote:
> There are number of cases where pcidevs_lock() is used to protect
> something that is not related to PCI devices per se.
>
> Probably pcidev_lock in these places should be replaced with some
> other lock.
>
> This patch is not intended to be merged
There are number of cases where pcidevs_lock() is used to protect
something that is not related to PCI devices per se.
Probably pcidev_lock in these places should be replaced with some
other lock.
This patch is not intended to be merged and is present only to discuss
this use of pcidevs_lock()