On 17/10/2023 11:54, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 17.10.2023 11:43, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
On 17/10/2023 10:26, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 17.10.2023 10:12, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
On 17/10/2023 09:02, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 16.10.2023 18:05, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
On 16/10/2023 17:45, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 17.10.2023 11:43, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> On 17/10/2023 10:26, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 17.10.2023 10:12, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
>>> On 17/10/2023 09:02, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 16.10.2023 18:05, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> On 16/10/2023 17:45, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 12.10.2023 17:28,
On 17/10/2023 10:26, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 17.10.2023 10:12, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
On 17/10/2023 09:02, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 16.10.2023 18:05, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
On 16/10/2023 17:45, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 12.10.2023 17:28, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
The definition of MC_NCLASSES contained a
On 17.10.2023 10:12, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> On 17/10/2023 09:02, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 16.10.2023 18:05, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
>>> On 16/10/2023 17:45, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 12.10.2023 17:28, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> The definition of MC_NCLASSES contained a violation of MISRA C:2012
On 17/10/2023 09:02, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 16.10.2023 18:05, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
On 16/10/2023 17:45, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 12.10.2023 17:28, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
The definition of MC_NCLASSES contained a violation of MISRA C:2012
Rule 10.1, therefore by moving it as an enumeration
On 16.10.2023 18:05, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> On 16/10/2023 17:45, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 12.10.2023 17:28, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
>>> The definition of MC_NCLASSES contained a violation of MISRA C:2012
>>> Rule 10.1, therefore by moving it as an enumeration constant resolves
>>> the
>>>
On 16/10/2023 17:45, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 12.10.2023 17:28, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
The definition of MC_NCLASSES contained a violation of MISRA C:2012
Rule 10.1, therefore by moving it as an enumeration constant resolves
the
violation and makes it more resilient to possible additions to that
On 12.10.2023 17:28, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> The definition of MC_NCLASSES contained a violation of MISRA C:2012
> Rule 10.1, therefore by moving it as an enumeration constant resolves the
> violation and makes it more resilient to possible additions to that enum.
And using an enumerator as array
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> The definition of MC_NCLASSES contained a violation of MISRA C:2012
> Rule 10.1, therefore by moving it as an enumeration constant resolves the
> violation and makes it more resilient to possible additions to that enum.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicola
The definition of MC_NCLASSES contained a violation of MISRA C:2012
Rule 10.1, therefore by moving it as an enumeration constant resolves the
violation and makes it more resilient to possible additions to that enum.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini
---
Note that the use of an enum constant as
10 matches
Mail list logo
