On 12.03.2024 16:29, Krystian Hebel wrote:
> On 7.02.2024 17:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 02.02.2024 19:11, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> On 14/11/2023 17:50, Krystian Hebel wrote:
--- a/xen/arch/x86/numa.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/numa.c
@@ -54,14 +54,13 @@ bool __init
On 8.02.2024 08:29, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 14.11.2023 18:50, Krystian Hebel wrote:
Both fields held the same data.
Supposedly the same data only. They come from different origins, and you're
hiding this quite well by leaving all sites in place where the field is
written. Both items are also
Hi,
On 7.02.2024 17:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 02.02.2024 19:11, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
On 14/11/2023 17:50, Krystian Hebel wrote:
Both fields held the same data.
Signed-off-by: Krystian Hebel
---
xen/arch/x86/boot/x86_64.S | 8 +---
xen/arch/x86/include/asm/asm_defns.h
On 14.11.2023 18:50, Krystian Hebel wrote:
> Both fields held the same data.
Supposedly the same data only. They come from different origins, and you're
hiding this quite well by leaving all sites in place where the field is
written. Both items are also used for entirely separate purposes. So you
On 02.02.2024 19:11, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 14/11/2023 17:50, Krystian Hebel wrote:
>> Both fields held the same data.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krystian Hebel
>> ---
>> xen/arch/x86/boot/x86_64.S | 8 +---
>> xen/arch/x86/include/asm/asm_defns.h | 2 +-
>>
Hi,
On 14/11/2023 17:50, Krystian Hebel wrote:
Both fields held the same data.
Signed-off-by: Krystian Hebel
---
xen/arch/x86/boot/x86_64.S | 8 +---
xen/arch/x86/include/asm/asm_defns.h | 2 +-
xen/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 2 ++
xen/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h
Both fields held the same data.
Signed-off-by: Krystian Hebel
---
xen/arch/x86/boot/x86_64.S | 8 +---
xen/arch/x86/include/asm/asm_defns.h | 2 +-
xen/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 2 ++
xen/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h | 4
xen/arch/x86/numa.c
