Jason Andryuk writes ("Re: [XEN RFC for-4.14] Re: use of "stat -""):
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 10:08 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
> > I'm about to test this then, but to be honest I have no idea what
> > to do with the comment. I don't think I could properly justify
Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [XEN RFC for-4.14] Re: use of "stat -""):
> I'm about to test this then, but to be honest I have no idea what
> to do with the comment. I don't think I could properly justify its
> deletion in the description (beyond saying it's not really tr
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 10:08 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 25.06.2020 15:27, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Jason Andryuk writes ("Re: [XEN RFC for-4.14] Re: use of "stat -""):
> >> I was going to just write a patch to replace - with /dev/stdin and ask
>
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 9:48 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 25.06.2020 15:31, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [XEN RFC for-4.14] Re: use of "stat -""):
> >> Looking at vfs_statx() in the kernel, I can't see any provisions to
> >> get
On 25.06.2020 15:27, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Jason Andryuk writes ("Re: [XEN RFC for-4.14] Re: use of "stat -""):
>> I was going to just write a patch to replace - with /dev/stdin and ask
>> Jan to test it. When I opened the script, this comment was staring at
>
On 25.06.2020 15:31, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [XEN RFC for-4.14] Re: use of "stat -""):
>> Looking at vfs_statx() in the kernel, I can't see any provisions to
>> get at the data without traversing the specified path.
>
> The que
Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [XEN RFC for-4.14] Re: use of "stat -""):
> Looking at vfs_statx() in the kernel, I can't see any provisions to
> get at the data without traversing the specified path.
The question is what "traversing the path" means.
How do you expla
Jason Andryuk writes ("Re: [XEN RFC for-4.14] Re: use of "stat -""):
> I was going to just write a patch to replace - with /dev/stdin and ask
> Jan to test it. When I opened the script, this comment was staring at
> me:
> # We can't just stat /dev
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 3:05 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 25.06.2020 04:37, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 12:19 PM Ian Jackson wrote:
> >>
> >> Jan Beulich writes ("Re: use of "stat -""):
> >>> [CAUTION - EXTERNAL EMAIL] DO NOT reply, click links, or open attachments
> >>>
On Jun 24, 2020, at 22:39, Jason Andryuk wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 12:19 PM Ian Jackson wrote:
>>
>> Jan Beulich writes ("Re: use of "stat -""):
>>> [CAUTION - EXTERNAL EMAIL] DO NOT reply, click links, or open attachments
>>> unless you have verified the sender and know the content
On 25.06.2020 04:37, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 12:19 PM Ian Jackson wrote:
>>
>> Jan Beulich writes ("Re: use of "stat -""):
>>> [CAUTION - EXTERNAL EMAIL] DO NOT reply, click links, or open attachments
>>> unless you have verified the sender and know the content is safe.
> -Original Message-
> From: Ian Jackson
> Sent: 24 June 2020 17:20
> To: Jan Beulich
> Cc: Elliott Mitchell ; Andrew Cooper
> ; Jason Andryuk
> ; Paul Durrant ; Wei Liu ;
> xen-
> de...@lists.xenproject.org
> Subject: [XEN RFC for-4.14] Re: use of "s
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 12:19 PM Ian Jackson wrote:
>
> Jan Beulich writes ("Re: use of "stat -""):
> > [CAUTION - EXTERNAL EMAIL] DO NOT reply, click links, or open attachments
> > unless you have verified the sender and know the content is safe.
> > On 14.05.2020 13:02, Ian Jackson wrote:
> >
Jan Beulich writes ("Re: use of "stat -""):
> [CAUTION - EXTERNAL EMAIL] DO NOT reply, click links, or open attachments
> unless you have verified the sender and know the content is safe.
> On 14.05.2020 13:02, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > I've read this thread. Jan, I'm sorry that this causes you
> >
14 matches
Mail list logo
