On 14.08.19 15:02, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 14/08/2019 13:51, George Dunlap wrote:
On 8/7/19 5:03 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
Whatever we do in Xen, it'll only allow to work around that issue.
An actual fix belongs in the kernel(s). For this reason I suppose
what we're talking about here is a
On 14/08/2019 13:51, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 8/7/19 5:03 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Whatever we do in Xen, it'll only allow to work around that issue.
>> An actual fix belongs in the kernel(s). For this reason I suppose
>> what we're talking about here is a feature (from Xen's pov), not a
>> bug
On 8/7/19 5:03 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Whatever we do in Xen, it'll only allow to work around that issue.
> An actual fix belongs in the kernel(s). For this reason I suppose
> what we're talking about here is a feature (from Xen's pov), not a
> bug fix. And it being a feature, it should
On 07.08.2019 17:57, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 07/08/2019 16:08, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 07.08.2019 17:00, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 07/08/2019 15:30, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 07.08.2019 15:41, Andrew Cooper wrote:
Furthermore, if there is this problem for event channels, then
there is
almost
On 07/08/2019 16:08, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 07.08.2019 17:00, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 07/08/2019 15:30, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 07.08.2019 15:41, Andrew Cooper wrote:
Furthermore, if there is this problem for event channels, then
there is
almost certainly a related problem for
> On 7. Aug 2019, at 15:41, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>
> On 07/08/2019 12:20, Eslam Elnikety wrote:
>> diff --git a/xen/include/public/domctl.h b/xen/include/public/domctl.h
>> index 19486d5e32..654b4fdd22 100644
>> --- a/xen/include/public/domctl.h
>> +++ b/xen/include/public/domctl.h
>> @@ -64,6
On 07.08.2019 17:00, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 07/08/2019 15:30, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 07.08.2019 15:41, Andrew Cooper wrote:
Furthermore, if there is this problem for event channels, then there is
almost certainly a related problem for grant tables.
The control in Xen should be expressed in a
On 07/08/2019 15:30, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 07.08.2019 15:41, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 07/08/2019 12:20, Eslam Elnikety wrote:
>>> diff --git a/xen/include/public/domctl.h b/xen/include/public/domctl.h
>>> index 19486d5e32..654b4fdd22 100644
>>> --- a/xen/include/public/domctl.h
>>> +++
Hi,
On 07/08/2019 15:35, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 07.08.2019 13:20, Eslam Elnikety wrote:
>> --- a/xen/include/xen/sched.h
+++ b/xen/include/xen/sched.h
@@ -338,6 +338,7 @@ struct domain
struct evtchn **evtchn_group[NR_EVTCHN_GROUPS]; /* all other buckets */
unsigned int
On 07.08.2019 13:20, Eslam Elnikety wrote:
Adding support for FIFO event channel ABI was first introduced in Xen 4.4
(see 88910061ec6). Make this support tunable, since the choice of which
event channel ABI has implications for hibernation. Consider resuming a
pre Xen 4.4 hibernated Linux guest.
On 07.08.2019 15:41, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 07/08/2019 12:20, Eslam Elnikety wrote:
diff --git a/xen/include/public/domctl.h b/xen/include/public/domctl.h
index 19486d5e32..654b4fdd22 100644
--- a/xen/include/public/domctl.h
+++ b/xen/include/public/domctl.h
@@ -64,6 +64,9 @@ struct
On 07/08/2019 12:20, Eslam Elnikety wrote:
> diff --git a/xen/include/public/domctl.h b/xen/include/public/domctl.h
> index 19486d5e32..654b4fdd22 100644
> --- a/xen/include/public/domctl.h
> +++ b/xen/include/public/domctl.h
> @@ -64,6 +64,9 @@ struct xen_domctl_createdomain {
> /* Is this a
> On 7. Aug 2019, at 14:30, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>
> On 07/08/2019 13:07, Elnikety, Eslam wrote:
>>> On 7. Aug 2019, at 13:40, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>>
>>> On 07/08/2019 12:20, Eslam Elnikety wrote:
Adding support for FIFO event channel ABI was first introduced in Xen 4.4
(see
On 07/08/2019 13:07, Elnikety, Eslam wrote:
>> On 7. Aug 2019, at 13:40, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>
>> On 07/08/2019 12:20, Eslam Elnikety wrote:
>>> Adding support for FIFO event channel ABI was first introduced in Xen 4.4
>>> (see 88910061ec6). Make this support tunable, since the choice of which
On 07/08/2019 13:04, Woodhouse, David wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-08-07 at 12:40 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 07/08/2019 12:20, Eslam Elnikety wrote:
>>> Adding support for FIFO event channel ABI was first introduced in Xen 4.4
>>> (see 88910061ec6). Make this support tunable, since the choice of
On 07.08.2019 14:07, Elnikety, Eslam wrote:
On 7. Aug 2019, at 13:40, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 07/08/2019 12:20, Eslam Elnikety wrote:
Adding support for FIFO event channel ABI was first introduced in Xen 4.4
(see 88910061ec6). Make this support tunable, since the choice of which
event
On 07.08.2019 14:04, Woodhouse, David wrote:
On Wed, 2019-08-07 at 12:40 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 07/08/2019 12:20, Eslam Elnikety wrote:
Adding support for FIFO event channel ABI was first introduced in Xen 4.4
(see 88910061ec6). Make this support tunable, since the choice of which
> On 7. Aug 2019, at 13:40, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>
> On 07/08/2019 12:20, Eslam Elnikety wrote:
>> Adding support for FIFO event channel ABI was first introduced in Xen 4.4
>> (see 88910061ec6). Make this support tunable, since the choice of which
>> event channel ABI has implications for
On Wed, 2019-08-07 at 12:40 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 07/08/2019 12:20, Eslam Elnikety wrote:
> > Adding support for FIFO event channel ABI was first introduced in Xen 4.4
> > (see 88910061ec6). Make this support tunable, since the choice of which
> > event channel ABI has implications for
On 07/08/2019 12:20, Eslam Elnikety wrote:
> Adding support for FIFO event channel ABI was first introduced in Xen 4.4
> (see 88910061ec6). Make this support tunable, since the choice of which
> event channel ABI has implications for hibernation. Consider resuming a
> pre Xen 4.4 hibernated Linux
Adding support for FIFO event channel ABI was first introduced in Xen 4.4
(see 88910061ec6). Make this support tunable, since the choice of which
event channel ABI has implications for hibernation. Consider resuming a
pre Xen 4.4 hibernated Linux guest. The guest boot kernel defaults to FIFO
ABI,
21 matches
Mail list logo
