Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/shadow: don't enable shadow mode with too small a shadow allocation (part 2)

2019-09-05 Thread Tim Deegan
At 09:55 +0200 on 04 Sep (1567590940), Jan Beulich wrote: > Commit 2634b997af ("x86/shadow: don't enable shadow mode with too small > a shadow allocation") was incomplete: The adjustment done there to > shadow_enable() is also needed in shadow_one_bit_enable(). The (new) > problem report was

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/shadow: don't enable shadow mode with too small a shadow allocation (part 2)

2019-09-04 Thread Jan Beulich
On 04.09.2019 13:28, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 04/09/2019 08:55, Jan Beulich wrote: >> Commit 2634b997af ("x86/shadow: don't enable shadow mode with too small >> a shadow allocation") was incomplete: The adjustment done there to >> shadow_enable() is also needed in shadow_one_bit_enable(). The

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/shadow: don't enable shadow mode with too small a shadow allocation (part 2)

2019-09-04 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 04/09/2019 08:55, Jan Beulich wrote: > Commit 2634b997af ("x86/shadow: don't enable shadow mode with too small > a shadow allocation") was incomplete: The adjustment done there to > shadow_enable() is also needed in shadow_one_bit_enable(). The (new) > problem report was (apparently) a failed

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/shadow: don't enable shadow mode with too small a shadow allocation (part 2)

2019-09-04 Thread Jan Beulich
Commit 2634b997af ("x86/shadow: don't enable shadow mode with too small a shadow allocation") was incomplete: The adjustment done there to shadow_enable() is also needed in shadow_one_bit_enable(). The (new) problem report was (apparently) a failed PV guest migration followed by another migration