On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 03:42:37PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> Because of a bug in 2010, LMSL support didn't functioned in Xen.
>
> c/s f2c608444 noticed but avoided fixing the issue for migration reasons. In
> addition to migration problems, changes to the segmentation logic for
> emulation
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 03:42:37PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> Because of a bug in 2010, LMSL support didn't functioned in Xen.
>
> c/s f2c608444 noticed but avoided fixing the issue for migration reasons. In
> addition to migration problems, changes to the segmentation logic for
> emulation
>>> On 23.07.18 at 16:42, wrote:
> Because of a bug in 2010, LMSL support didn't functioned in Xen.
>
> c/s f2c608444 noticed but avoided fixing the issue for migration reasons. In
> addition to migration problems, changes to the segmentation logic for
> emulation would be needed before the
On 07/23/2018 06:02 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 07/23/2018 10:42 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> Because of a bug in 2010, LMSL support didn't functioned in Xen.
>>
>> c/s f2c608444 noticed but avoided fixing the issue for migration reasons. In
>> addition to migration problems, changes to the
On 07/23/2018 10:42 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> Because of a bug in 2010, LMSL support didn't functioned in Xen.
>
> c/s f2c608444 noticed but avoided fixing the issue for migration reasons. In
> addition to migration problems, changes to the segmentation logic for
> emulation would be needed
Because of a bug in 2010, LMSL support didn't functioned in Xen.
c/s f2c608444 noticed but avoided fixing the issue for migration reasons. In
addition to migration problems, changes to the segmentation logic for
emulation would be needed before the feature could be enabled.
This feature is
