On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 11:38:09AM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> In hindsight, using NATIVE and VMEXIT as naming terminology was not clever.
> A future change wants to split SPEC_CTRL_EXIT_TO_GUEST into PV and HVM
> specific implementations, and using VMEXIT as a term is completely wrong.
>
> Take
In hindsight, using NATIVE and VMEXIT as naming terminology was not clever.
A future change wants to split SPEC_CTRL_EXIT_TO_GUEST into PV and HVM
specific implementations, and using VMEXIT as a term is completely wrong.
Take the opportunity to fix some stale documentation in spec_ctrl_asm.h. The
