Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 10/16] x86/HVM: patch indirect calls through hvm_funcs to direct ones

2018-07-13 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 13.07.18 at 12:06, wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Xen-devel [mailto:xen-devel-boun...@lists.xenproject.org] On Behalf >> Of Jan Beulich >> Sent: 11 July 2018 14:43 >> To: xen-devel >> Cc: Andrew Cooper >> Subject: [Xen

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 10/16] x86/HVM: patch indirect calls through hvm_funcs to direct ones

2018-07-13 Thread Paul Durrant
> -Original Message- > From: Xen-devel [mailto:xen-devel-boun...@lists.xenproject.org] On Behalf > Of Jan Beulich > Sent: 11 July 2018 14:43 > To: xen-devel > Cc: Andrew Cooper > Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 10/16] x86/HVM: patch indirect calls through > hvm_funcs

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 10/16] x86/HVM: patch indirect calls through hvm_funcs to direct ones

2018-07-11 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 11.07.18 at 15:42, wrote: > This is intentionally not touching hooks used rarely (or not at all) > during the lifetime of a VM, like {domain,vcpu}_initialise or cpu_up, > as well as nested, VM event, and altp2m ones (they can all be done > later, if so desired). Virtual Interrupt delivery o

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 10/16] x86/HVM: patch indirect calls through hvm_funcs to direct ones

2018-07-11 Thread Jan Beulich
This is intentionally not touching hooks used rarely (or not at all) during the lifetime of a VM, like {domain,vcpu}_initialise or cpu_up, as well as nested, VM event, and altp2m ones (they can all be done later, if so desired). Virtual Interrupt delivery ones will be dealt with in a subsequent pat