>>> On 10.12.18 at 15:00, wrote:
> On 07/12/2018 11:18, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> While actually benign (operands are either register or memory ones
>> anyway), I think it is better to use != instead of == for such checks.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
>
> I don't see the point of making this
On 07/12/2018 11:18, Jan Beulich wrote:
> While actually benign (operands are either register or memory ones
> anyway), I think it is better to use != instead of == for such checks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
I don't see the point of making this change. Code is easier to follow
when there
While actually benign (operands are either register or memory ones
anyway), I think it is better to use != instead of == for such checks.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
--- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c
@@ -5918,11 +5918,11 @@ x86_emulate(
