On 07/01/2019 10:39, Jan Beulich wrote:
> It has no users, so rather than fixing its use of types (first and
> foremost c would need to be cast to unsigned char in the comparison
> expression) drop it altogether. memchr() ought to be fine for all
> purposes.
>
> Take the opportunity and also do
It has no users, so rather than fixing its use of types (first and
foremost c would need to be cast to unsigned char in the comparison
expression) drop it altogether. memchr() ought to be fine for all
purposes.
Take the opportunity and also do some stylistic adjustments to its
surviving sibling
