>>> On 29.01.19 at 21:43, wrote:
> On 23/01/2019 11:35, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 21.01.19 at 16:37, wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/guest/pvh-boot.c
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/guest/pvh-boot.c
>>> @@ -38,12 +38,20 @@ static const char *__initdata pvh_loader = "PVH
> Directboot";
>>> static void
On 23/01/2019 11:35, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 21.01.19 at 16:37, wrote:
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/guest/pvh-boot.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/guest/pvh-boot.c
>> @@ -38,12 +38,20 @@ static const char *__initdata pvh_loader = "PVH
>> Directboot";
>> static void __init convert_pvh_info(multiboot_info_t
>>> On 21.01.19 at 16:37, wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/guest/pvh-boot.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/guest/pvh-boot.c
> @@ -38,12 +38,20 @@ static const char *__initdata pvh_loader = "PVH
> Directboot";
> static void __init convert_pvh_info(multiboot_info_t **mbi,
>
On 21/01/2019 15:52, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 03:37:20PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> panic() doesn't contain any caller information, so the sum output of:
>>
>> (d1) (XEN)
>> (d1) (XEN)
>> (d1) (XEN) Panic on CPU 0:
>> (d1) (XEN)
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 03:37:20PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> panic() doesn't contain any caller information, so the sum output of:
>
> (d1) (XEN)
> (d1) (XEN)
> (d1) (XEN) Panic on CPU 0:
> (d1) (XEN) Magic value is wrong: 336ec568
> (d1)
panic() doesn't contain any caller information, so the sum output of:
(d1) (XEN)
(d1) (XEN)
(d1) (XEN) Panic on CPU 0:
(d1) (XEN) Magic value is wrong: 336ec568
(d1) (XEN)
(d1) (XEN)
isn't helpful at
