Hi,
On 26/01/18 18:12, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote:
On 26.01.18 20:07, Julien Grall wrote:
On 26/01/18 18:03, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote:
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/smccc.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/smccc.h
index f543dea0bb..303517459f 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-arm/smccc.h
+++
On 26.01.18 20:07, Julien Grall wrote:
On 26/01/18 18:03, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote:
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/smccc.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/smccc.h
index f543dea0bb..303517459f 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-arm/smccc.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/smccc.h
@@ -82,9 +82,23 @@ static inline
On 24.01.18 20:34, Julien Grall wrote:
The current implementation of SMCCC relies on the fact only function
number (bits [15:0]) is enough to identify what to implement.
However, PSCI call are only available in the range 0x8400-0x841F
and 0xC400-0xC41F. Furthermore, not all
The current implementation of SMCCC relies on the fact only function
number (bits [15:0]) is enough to identify what to implement.
However, PSCI call are only available in the range 0x8400-0x841F
and 0xC400-0xC41F. Furthermore, not all SMC32 functions have
equivalent in the SMC64.