Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/6] x86/shadow: remove pointless loops over all vCPU-s

2017-12-20 Thread Tim Deegan
At 08:05 -0700 on 12 Dec (1513065939), Jan Beulich wrote: > The vCPU count can be had more directly. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich Acked-by: Tim Deegan > In the sh_make_shadow() case the question is whether it really was > intended to count all vCPU-s, rather

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/6] x86/shadow: remove pointless loops over all vCPU-s

2017-12-12 Thread Jan Beulich
The vCPU count can be had more directly. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich --- In the sh_make_shadow() case the question is whether it really was intended to count all vCPU-s, rather than e.g. only all initialized ones. I guess the problem would be the phase before the guest actually