On 29.08.2019 16:38, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 29/08/2019 15:23, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 29.08.2019 16:08, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> On 14/06/2019 12:38, Jan Beulich wrote:
@@ -38,9 +38,9 @@ ENTRY(wakeup_start)
movw%ax, %ss# Need this? How to ret if clobbered?
On 29/08/2019 15:23, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 29.08.2019 16:08, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 14/06/2019 12:38, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> To "compensate" for the code size growth by an earlier change:
>>> - drop "trampoline" labels (in almost all cases the target label is
>>> reachable with an
On 29.08.2019 16:08, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 14/06/2019 12:38, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> To "compensate" for the code size growth by an earlier change:
>> - drop "trampoline" labels (in almost all cases the target label is
>> reachable with an 8-bit-displacement branch anyway, and a single 16-
>>
On 14/06/2019 12:38, Jan Beulich wrote:
> To "compensate" for the code size growth by an earlier change:
> - drop "trampoline" labels (in almost all cases the target label is
> reachable with an 8-bit-displacement branch anyway, and a single 16-
> bit-displacement branch is still better than a
To "compensate" for the code size growth by an earlier change:
- drop "trampoline" labels (in almost all cases the target label is
reachable with an 8-bit-displacement branch anyway, and a single 16-
bit-displacement branch is still better than a pair of two branches)
- drop an entirely dead
