On 09.12.19 17:38, Durrant, Paul wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jürgen Groß
Sent: 09 December 2019 13:55
To: Durrant, Paul ; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky ; Stefano Stabellini
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] xen/interface: don't discard
> -Original Message-
> From: Jürgen Groß
> Sent: 09 December 2019 13:55
> To: Durrant, Paul ; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;
> xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky ; Stefano Stabellini
>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] xen/interface: don't discard pending work in
>
On 05.12.19 15:01, Paul Durrant wrote:
Currently these macros will skip over any requests/responses that are
added to the shared ring whilst it is detached. This, in general, is not
a desirable semantic since most frontend implementations will eventually
block waiting for a response which would
ct: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/4] xen/interface: don't discard pending
> work in FRONT/BACK_RING_ATTACH
>
> On 09.12.19 12:41, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 02:01:22PM +, Paul Durrant wrote:
> >> Currently these macros will skip over any requests/r
On 09.12.19 12:41, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 02:01:22PM +, Paul Durrant wrote:
Currently these macros will skip over any requests/responses that are
added to the shared ring whilst it is detached. This, in general, is not
a desirable semantic since most frontend
On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 02:01:22PM +, Paul Durrant wrote:
> Currently these macros will skip over any requests/responses that are
> added to the shared ring whilst it is detached. This, in general, is not
> a desirable semantic since most frontend implementations will eventually
> block
Currently these macros will skip over any requests/responses that are
added to the shared ring whilst it is detached. This, in general, is not
a desirable semantic since most frontend implementations will eventually
block waiting for a response which would either never appear or never be
