>>> On 18.01.18 at 12:00, wrote:
> On 18/01/18 10:57, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 18/01/18 10:38, George Dunlap wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 7:59 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 12.01.18 at 19:37, wrote:
> ---
On 18/01/18 10:57, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 18/01/18 10:38, George Dunlap wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 7:59 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 12.01.18 at 19:37, wrote:
Windows is the only OS which pages out kernel datastructures, so chances
On 18/01/18 10:38, George Dunlap wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 7:59 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 12.01.18 at 19:37, wrote:
>>> Windows is the only OS which pages out kernel datastructures, so chances are
>>> good that this is a vestigial
>>> On 18.01.18 at 11:38, wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 7:59 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 12.01.18 at 19:37, wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
>>> @@ -1942,11 +1942,8 @@ int
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 7:59 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 12.01.18 at 19:37, wrote:
>> Windows is the only OS which pages out kernel datastructures, so chances are
>> good that this is a vestigial remnant of the PV Windows XP experiment.
>
> This
>>> On 12.01.18 at 19:37, wrote:
> Windows is the only OS which pages out kernel datastructures, so chances are
> good that this is a vestigial remnant of the PV Windows XP experiment.
This is based on what? How do you know there are no other OSes
doing so, including
On 1/12/18 12:37 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> Windows is the only OS which pages out kernel datastructures, so chances are
> good that this is a vestigial remnant of the PV Windows XP experiment.
> Furthermore the implementation is incomplete; it only functions for a present
> => not-present
Windows is the only OS which pages out kernel datastructures, so chances are
good that this is a vestigial remnant of the PV Windows XP experiment.
Furthermore the implementation is incomplete; it only functions for a present
=> not-present transition, rather than a present => read/write