Hi Jan,
On 05/02/2020 16:38, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 05.02.2020 15:34, Julien Grall wrote:
On 05/02/2020 13:16, Jan Beulich wrote:
This is more robust than the raw xmalloc_bytes().
Also add a sanity check on the input page range.
It feels to me that the commit message/title should focus on
On 05.02.2020 15:34, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 05/02/2020 13:16, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> This is more robust than the raw xmalloc_bytes().
>>
>> Also add a sanity check on the input page range.
>
> It feels to me that the commit message/title should focus on the sanity
> check. The xmalloc_array()
Hi Jan,
On 05/02/2020 13:16, Jan Beulich wrote:
This is more robust than the raw xmalloc_bytes().
Also add a sanity check on the input page range.
It feels to me that the commit message/title should focus on the sanity
check. The xmalloc_array() is just a cleanup is "less important".
This is more robust than the raw xmalloc_bytes().
Also add a sanity check on the input page range.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
--- a/xen/common/sysctl.c
+++ b/xen/common/sysctl.c
@@ -187,13 +187,17 @@ long do_sysctl(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xe
uint32_t *status, *ptr;
mfn_t mfn;