On 07.01.2020 15:31, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote:
>
>
> On 07.01.2020 15:55, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 07.01.2020 14:25, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote:
>>> On 27.12.2019 10:01, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 23.12.2019 15:04, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/mem_access.c
On 07.01.2020 15:55, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 07.01.2020 14:25, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote:
>> On 27.12.2019 10:01, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 23.12.2019 15:04, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote:
--- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/mem_access.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/mem_access.c
@@ -366,11 +366,12
On 07.01.2020 14:25, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote:
> On 27.12.2019 10:01, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 23.12.2019 15:04, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/mem_access.c
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/mem_access.c
>>> @@ -366,11 +366,12 @@ long p2m_set_mem_access(struct domain *d,
On 27.12.2019 10:01, Jan Beulich wrote:
> (re-sending, as I still don't see the mail having appeared on the list)
>
> On 23.12.2019 15:04, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote:
>> Changes since V5:
>> - Add black lines
>
> Luckily no color comes through in plain text mails ;-)
>
>> ---
On 27.12.2019 11:52, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 12/27/19 7:59 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 23.12.2019 19:08, George Dunlap wrote:
>>> What about the attached series of patches (compile-tested only)?
>>
>> This ...
>>
>>> +#define nospec_clip(index, size) \
>>> +({
On 12/27/19 7:59 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 23.12.2019 19:08, George Dunlap wrote:
>> What about the attached series of patches (compile-tested only)?
>
> This ...
>
>> +#define nospec_clip(index, size) \
>> +({ \
>> +bool
(re-sending, as I still don't see the mail having appeared on the list)
On 23.12.2019 15:04, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote:
> Changes since V5:
> - Add black lines
Luckily no color comes through in plain text mails ;-)
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/mem_access.c
> +++
On 23.12.2019 19:08, George Dunlap wrote:
> What about the attached series of patches (compile-tested only)?
This ...
>+#define nospec_clip(index, size) \
>+({ \
>+bool clipped = (index >= size); \
>+index =
On 23.12.2019 19:08, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 12/23/19 2:04 PM, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote:
>> This patch aims to sanitize indexes, potentially guest provided
>> values, for altp2m_eptp[] and altp2m_p2m[] arrays.
>>
>> Requested-by: Jan Beulich
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Isaila
>> ---
>>
On 12/23/19 2:04 PM, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote:
> This patch aims to sanitize indexes, potentially guest provided
> values, for altp2m_eptp[] and altp2m_p2m[] arrays.
>
> Requested-by: Jan Beulich
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Isaila
> ---
> CC: Razvan Cojocaru
> CC: Tamas K Lengyel
> CC:
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 7:04 AM Alexandru Stefan ISAILA
wrote:
>
> This patch aims to sanitize indexes, potentially guest provided
> values, for altp2m_eptp[] and altp2m_p2m[] arrays.
>
> Requested-by: Jan Beulich
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Isaila
For the mem_access bits:
Acked-by: Tamas K
This patch aims to sanitize indexes, potentially guest provided
values, for altp2m_eptp[] and altp2m_p2m[] arrays.
Requested-by: Jan Beulich
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Isaila
---
CC: Razvan Cojocaru
CC: Tamas K Lengyel
CC: Petre Pircalabu
CC: George Dunlap
CC: Jan Beulich
CC: Andrew Cooper
12 matches
Mail list logo
