On 11/05/18 12:38, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> In hindsight, the end result of the Spectre mitigations aren't as great as I'd
> hoped, and have several inefficiencies. Also, the `bti=` command line option
> isn't as flexible as intended.
>
> This series does four things:
>
> 1) Some internal cleanu
>>> On 11.05.18 at 12:38, wrote:
> In hindsight, the end result of the Spectre mitigations aren't as great as I'd
> hoped, and have several inefficiencies. Also, the `bti=` command line option
> isn't as flexible as intended.
>
> This series does four things:
>
> 1) Some internal cleanup, for
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 11:38:04AM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> In hindsight, the end result of the Spectre mitigations aren't as great as I'd
> hoped, and have several inefficiencies. Also, the `bti=` command line option
> isn't as flexible as intended.
I think this is a good argument for this
In hindsight, the end result of the Spectre mitigations aren't as great as I'd
hoped, and have several inefficiencies. Also, the `bti=` command line option
isn't as flexible as intended.
This series does four things:
1) Some internal cleanup, for clarity and to help the other features
2) Int