On 28.11.2019 12:44, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> c/s d0a699a389f1 "x86/monitor: add support for descriptor access events"
> introduced logic looking for what appeared to be exitinfo (not that this
> exists in SVM - exitinfo1 or 2 do), but actually passed the exit IDT vectoring
> information. There is
Hello,
Andrew Cooper writes:
> c/s d0a699a389f1 "x86/monitor: add support for descriptor access events"
> introduced logic looking for what appeared to be exitinfo (not that this
> exists in SVM - exitinfo1 or 2 do), but actually passed the exit IDT vectoring
> information. There is never any
On 28.11.2019 13:44, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> c/s d0a699a389f1 "x86/monitor: add support for descriptor access events"
> introduced logic looking for what appeared to be exitinfo (not that this
> exists in SVM - exitinfo1 or 2 do), but actually passed the exit IDT vectoring
> information. There
On 11/28/19 1:44 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> c/s d0a699a389f1 "x86/monitor: add support for descriptor access events"
> introduced logic looking for what appeared to be exitinfo (not that this
> exists in SVM - exitinfo1 or 2 do), but actually passed the exit IDT vectoring
> information. There is
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 4:44 AM Andrew Cooper wrote:
>
> c/s d0a699a389f1 "x86/monitor: add support for descriptor access events"
> introduced logic looking for what appeared to be exitinfo (not that this
> exists in SVM - exitinfo1 or 2 do), but actually passed the exit IDT vectoring
>
c/s d0a699a389f1 "x86/monitor: add support for descriptor access events"
introduced logic looking for what appeared to be exitinfo (not that this
exists in SVM - exitinfo1 or 2 do), but actually passed the exit IDT vectoring
information. There is never any IDT vectoring involved in these