On 21.11.2019 12:51, Chao Gao wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 11:21:13AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 21.11.2019 00:05, Chao Gao wrote:
>>> If a core with all of its thread being parked, late ucode loading
>>> which currently only loads ucode on online threads would lead to
>>> differing ucode
On 21.11.19 11:21, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 21.11.2019 00:05, Chao Gao wrote:
If a core with all of its thread being parked, late ucode loading
which currently only loads ucode on online threads would lead to
differing ucode revisions in the system. In general, keeping ucode
revision consistent
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 11:21:13AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>On 21.11.2019 00:05, Chao Gao wrote:
>> If a core with all of its thread being parked, late ucode loading
>> which currently only loads ucode on online threads would lead to
>> differing ucode revisions in the system. In general,
On 21.11.2019 00:05, Chao Gao wrote:
> If a core with all of its thread being parked, late ucode loading
> which currently only loads ucode on online threads would lead to
> differing ucode revisions in the system. In general, keeping ucode
> revision consistent would be less error-prone. To this
If a core with all of its thread being parked, late ucode loading
which currently only loads ucode on online threads would lead to
differing ucode revisions in the system. In general, keeping ucode
revision consistent would be less error-prone. To this end, if there
is a parked thread doesn't have