> From: Roger Pau Monne [mailto:roger@citrix.com]
> Sent: Saturday, March 3, 2018 12:19 AM
>
> Commit 406817 doesn't update nested VMX code in order to take into
> account L1 CR4 host mask when nested guest (L2) writes to CR4, and
> thus the mask written to CR4_GUEST_HOST_MASK is likely not as
On Fri, 2018-03-02 at 16:19 +, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> Commit 406817 doesn't update nested VMX code in order to take into
> account L1 CR4 host mask when nested guest (L2) writes to CR4, and
> thus the mask written to CR4_GUEST_HOST_MASK is likely not as
> restrictive as it should be.
>
> Als
Commit 406817 doesn't update nested VMX code in order to take into
account L1 CR4 host mask when nested guest (L2) writes to CR4, and
thus the mask written to CR4_GUEST_HOST_MASK is likely not as
restrictive as it should be.
Also the VVMCS GUEST_CR4 value should be updated to match the
underlying
