Hi,
On 11/12/2019 20:00, Jeff Kubascik wrote:
On 12/5/2019 3:28 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
However, set_timer expects a signed 64 bit value in ns. The conversion of cval
(unsigned 64 bit) from ticks to ns is going to overflow this. I'm not sure what
would be the best way to work around this
On 12/5/2019 3:28 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 05/12/2019 19:17, Jeff Kubascik wrote:
>> On 12/3/2019 1:04 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 26/11/2019 21:13, Jeff Kubascik wrote:
The physical timer traps apply an offset so that time starts at 0 for
the guest. However,
Hi,
On 05/12/2019 19:17, Jeff Kubascik wrote:
On 12/3/2019 1:04 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
On 26/11/2019 21:13, Jeff Kubascik wrote:
The physical timer traps apply an offset so that time starts at 0 for
the guest. However, this offset is not currently applied to the physical
counter. Per
On 12/3/2019 1:04 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 26/11/2019 21:13, Jeff Kubascik wrote:
>> The physical timer traps apply an offset so that time starts at 0 for
>> the guest. However, this offset is not currently applied to the physical
>> counter. Per the ARMv8 Reference Manual (ARM DDI
Hi,
On 26/11/2019 21:13, Jeff Kubascik wrote:
The physical timer traps apply an offset so that time starts at 0 for
the guest. However, this offset is not currently applied to the physical
counter. Per the ARMv8 Reference Manual (ARM DDI 0487E.a), section
D11.2.4 Timers, the "Offset" between
The physical timer traps apply an offset so that time starts at 0 for
the guest. However, this offset is not currently applied to the physical
counter. Per the ARMv8 Reference Manual (ARM DDI 0487E.a), section
D11.2.4 Timers, the "Offset" between the counter and timer should be
zero for a physical
