On Tue, 8 Oct 2019, Rob Herring wrote:
> As the removed comments say, these aren't DT based devices.
> of_dma_configure() is going to stop allowing a NULL DT node and calling
> it will no longer work.
>
> The comment is also now out of date as of commit 9ab91e7c5c51 ("arm64:
> default to the
On 10/10/19 11:32 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 9:00 AM Boris Ostrovsky
> wrote:
>> On 10/9/19 7:42 AM, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>>> On 10/8/19 10:41 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
As the removed comments say, these aren't DT based devices.
of_dma_configure() is going
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 9:00 AM Boris Ostrovsky
wrote:
>
> On 10/9/19 7:42 AM, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> > On 10/8/19 10:41 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> >> As the removed comments say, these aren't DT based devices.
> >> of_dma_configure() is going to stop allowing a NULL DT node and calling
>
On 10/9/19 7:42 AM, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> On 10/8/19 10:41 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> As the removed comments say, these aren't DT based devices.
>> of_dma_configure() is going to stop allowing a NULL DT node and calling
>> it will no longer work.
>>
>> The comment is also now out of
On 10/8/19 10:41 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> As the removed comments say, these aren't DT based devices.
> of_dma_configure() is going to stop allowing a NULL DT node and calling
> it will no longer work.
>
> The comment is also now out of date as of commit 9ab91e7c5c51 ("arm64:
> default to the
As the removed comments say, these aren't DT based devices.
of_dma_configure() is going to stop allowing a NULL DT node and calling
it will no longer work.
The comment is also now out of date as of commit 9ab91e7c5c51 ("arm64:
default to the direct mapping in get_arch_dma_ops"). Direct mapping
is
