On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 05:54:52PM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 11/7/19 3:36 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 10:16:46AM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> >
> >>> So, I suppose it can be relaxed to a null test and a WARN_ON that it
> >>> hasn't changed?
> >> You mean
> >>
On 11/7/19 3:36 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 10:16:46AM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>
>>> So, I suppose it can be relaxed to a null test and a WARN_ON that it
>>> hasn't changed?
>> You mean
>>
>> if (use_ptemod) {
>> WARN_ON(map->vma != vma);
>> ...
>>
>>
On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 10:16:46AM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> > So, I suppose it can be relaxed to a null test and a WARN_ON that it
> > hasn't changed?
>
> You mean
>
> if (use_ptemod) {
> WARN_ON(map->vma != vma);
> ...
>
>
> Yes, that sounds good.
I amended my copy of
On 11/4/19 9:31 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 05:03:31PM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 10/28/19 4:10 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>> @@ -445,17 +438,9 @@ static void gntdev_vma_close(struct vm_area_struct
>>> *vma)
>>> struct gntdev_priv *priv = file->private_data;
On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 05:03:31PM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 10/28/19 4:10 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > @@ -445,17 +438,9 @@ static void gntdev_vma_close(struct vm_area_struct
> > *vma)
> > struct gntdev_priv *priv = file->private_data;
> >
> > pr_debug("gntdev_vma_close
On 10/28/19 4:10 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> @@ -445,17 +438,9 @@ static void gntdev_vma_close(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> struct gntdev_priv *priv = file->private_data;
>
> pr_debug("gntdev_vma_close %p\n", vma);
> - if (use_ptemod) {
> - /* It is possible that an
On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 02:51:46PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 11/1/19 1:48 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 12:55:37PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> >> On 10/28/19 4:10 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >>> From: Jason Gunthorpe
> >>>
> >>> gntdev simply wants to
On 11/1/19 1:48 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 12:55:37PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 10/28/19 4:10 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>> From: Jason Gunthorpe
>>>
>>> gntdev simply wants to monitor a specific VMA for any notifier events,
>>> this can be done
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 12:55:37PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 10/28/19 4:10 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > From: Jason Gunthorpe
> >
> > gntdev simply wants to monitor a specific VMA for any notifier events,
> > this can be done straightforwardly using mmu_range_notifier_insert() over
> >
On 10/28/19 4:10 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> From: Jason Gunthorpe
>
> gntdev simply wants to monitor a specific VMA for any notifier events,
> this can be done straightforwardly using mmu_range_notifier_insert() over
> the VMA's VA range.
>
> The notifier should be attached until the original
From: Jason Gunthorpe
gntdev simply wants to monitor a specific VMA for any notifier events,
this can be done straightforwardly using mmu_range_notifier_insert() over
the VMA's VA range.
The notifier should be attached until the original VMA is destroyed.
It is unclear if any of this is even
11 matches
Mail list logo
