On 10.09.19 17:18, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 09.08.2019 16:58, Juergen Gross wrote:
In order to prepare for multiple vcpus per schedule unit move struct
task_slice in schedule() from the local stack into struct sched_unit
of the currently running unit.
The change looks mechanical enough to be prob
On 12.09.19 10:13, Dario Faggioli wrote:
On Fri, 2019-08-09 at 16:58 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
In order to prepare for multiple vcpus per schedule unit move struct
task_slice in schedule() from the local stack into struct sched_unit
of the currently running unit. To make access easier for the
On Fri, 2019-08-09 at 16:58 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> In order to prepare for multiple vcpus per schedule unit move struct
> task_slice in schedule() from the local stack into struct sched_unit
> of the currently running unit. To make access easier for the single
> schedulers add the pointer of
On 09.08.2019 16:58, Juergen Gross wrote:
> In order to prepare for multiple vcpus per schedule unit move struct
> task_slice in schedule() from the local stack into struct sched_unit
> of the currently running unit.
The change looks mechanical enough to be probably fine, but what's
the connection
In order to prepare for multiple vcpus per schedule unit move struct
task_slice in schedule() from the local stack into struct sched_unit
of the currently running unit. To make access easier for the single
schedulers add the pointer of the currently running unit as a parameter
of do_schedule().
Wh