On 02.09.19 13:06, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 27.08.2019 14:40, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 27.08.19 14:37, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 27/08/2019 11:59, Juergen Gross wrote:
+static void *
+sched_idle_alloc_vdata(const struct scheduler *ops, struct vcpu *v,
+ void *dd)
+{
+/*
On 27.08.2019 14:40, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 27.08.19 14:37, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 27/08/2019 11:59, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> +static void *
>>> +sched_idle_alloc_vdata(const struct scheduler *ops, struct vcpu *v,
>>> + void *dd)
>>> +{
>>> +/* Any non-NULL pointer
On 27.08.19 14:37, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 27/08/2019 11:59, Juergen Gross wrote:
+static void *
+sched_idle_alloc_vdata(const struct scheduler *ops, struct vcpu *v,
+ void *dd)
+{
+/* Any non-NULL pointer is fine here. */
+return (void *)1UL;
As an observation,
On 27/08/2019 11:59, Juergen Gross wrote:
> +static void *
> +sched_idle_alloc_vdata(const struct scheduler *ops, struct vcpu *v,
> + void *dd)
> +{
> +/* Any non-NULL pointer is fine here. */
> +return (void *)1UL;
As an observation, the vdata interface (and others,
Instead of having a full blown scheduler running for the free cpus
add a very minimalistic scheduler for that purpose only ever scheduling
the related idle vcpu. This has the big advantage of not needing any
per-cpu, per-domain or per-scheduling unit data for free cpus and in
turn simplifying
